Cited by 46Motor Control and AdaptationNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismTactile and Sensory Interactions

Brain correlates of fast and slow handwriting in humans: A PET-performance correlation analysis

Siebner, Hartwig R., Limmer, Claus, Peinemann, Alexander, Bartenstein, Peter, Drzezga, Alexander, Conrad, Bastian·2001·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The present study examined the cerebral control of velocity during handwriting. We employed H 215 O positron emission tomography (PET) to measure the regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in 10 healthy subjects. Participants were required to write the German verb ‘bellen’ (‘to bark’) either at their normal speed (i.e. fast open‐loop handwriting) or to write at approximately half of their normal speed without visual feedback. The second task required a continuous modification of the motor output according to the kinaesthetic feedback from the hand (i.e. slow closed‐loop handwriting). Pencil movements were recorded during PET scanning and analysed off‐line using a stroke‐based analysing program. The mean number of inversions in velocity (NIV) per stroke was used to quantify the mode of motor control during each PET scan. A NIV of 1 indicates fast open‐loop processing, whereas an increase in NIV reflects a shift towards slow closed‐loop processing of handwriting. Foci in the left primary sensorimotor cortex, the right lateral premotor cortex, the left anterior parietal cortex, the left anterior putamen, the left rostral supplementary motor area and the right precuneus showed a graded increase in functional activation with the mean NIV per stroke, suggesting that this set of brain regions is particularly involved in the processing of slow closed‐loop writing movements. No area showed a negative relationship between rCBF and the mean NIV per stroke, suggesting that fast open‐loop handwriting is achieved by an optimized cooperation of the manual sensorimotor network rather than by a selective activation of a distinct network component.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01694.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Handwriting activates a broader network of motor-related and language-processing areas compared with typing.

    “research by Longcamp et al. [22] and Siebner et al. [31] demonstrated that handwriting activates a broader network of motor-related and language-processing areas compared with typing”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siebner, H. R., Limmer, C., Peinemann, A., Bartenstein, P., Drzezga, A., & Conrad, B.
Affiliations
  • National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
Siebner, Hartwig R.
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-08
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
726-736
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W1969706944
Cited by
46
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
handwriting, writing speed, closed-loop motor control, kinaesthetic feedback, regional cerebral blood flow, primary sensorimotor cortex, premotor cortex, parietal cortex, putamen, supplementary motor area, precuneus
MeSH terms
Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Feedback, Female, Handwriting, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Skills, Movement, Nerve Net, Putamen, Time Factors, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Verbal Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review