Brain correlates of fast and slow handwriting in humans: A PET-performance correlation analysis
Abstract
The present study examined the cerebral control of velocity during handwriting. We employed H 215 O positron emission tomography (PET) to measure the regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in 10 healthy subjects. Participants were required to write the German verb ‘bellen’ (‘to bark’) either at their normal speed (i.e. fast open‐loop handwriting) or to write at approximately half of their normal speed without visual feedback. The second task required a continuous modification of the motor output according to the kinaesthetic feedback from the hand (i.e. slow closed‐loop handwriting). Pencil movements were recorded during PET scanning and analysed off‐line using a stroke‐based analysing program. The mean number of inversions in velocity (NIV) per stroke was used to quantify the mode of motor control during each PET scan. A NIV of 1 indicates fast open‐loop processing, whereas an increase in NIV reflects a shift towards slow closed‐loop processing of handwriting. Foci in the left primary sensorimotor cortex, the right lateral premotor cortex, the left anterior parietal cortex, the left anterior putamen, the left rostral supplementary motor area and the right precuneus showed a graded increase in functional activation with the mean NIV per stroke, suggesting that this set of brain regions is particularly involved in the processing of slow closed‐loop writing movements. No area showed a negative relationship between rCBF and the mean NIV per stroke, suggesting that fast open‐loop handwriting is achieved by an optimized cooperation of the manual sensorimotor network rather than by a selective activation of a distinct network component.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Handwriting activates a broader network of motor-related and language-processing areas compared with typing.
“research by Longcamp et al. [22] and Siebner et al. [31] demonstrated that handwriting activates a broader network of motor-related and language-processing areas compared with typing”
From The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle? (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
Cites
Functional anatomy of the basal ganglia. I. The cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical loop
Parent, A., & Hazrati, L.-N. (1995) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/0165-0173(94)00007-c · Cited by 2,161 · see citing works
Mountcastle, V. B., Lynch, J. C., Georgopoulos, A., Sakata, H., & Acuna, C. (1975) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1975.38.4.871 · Cited by 2,061 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Area PE receives proprioceptive and cutaneous input from the limb and responds to somaesthetic stimuli, but it does not receive visual input (Sakata et al., 1973; Mountcastle et al., 1975).”
BackgroundRepresenting spatial information for limb movement: role of area 5 in the monkey
Lacquaniti, F., Guigon, E., Bianchi, L., Ferraina, S., & Caminiti, R. (1995) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/5.5.391 · Cited by 398 · cited 2× · see citing works
“, 1990) and the location of the arm in space in a body-centred coordinate system (Lacquaniti et al., 1995).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle?
Marano, G., Kotzalidis, G. D., Lisci, F. M., Anesini, M. B., Rossi, S., Barbonetti, S., Cangini, A., Ronsisvalle, A., Artuso, L., Falsini, C., et al. (2025) · Life · doi:10.3390/life15030345 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Siebner, H. R., Limmer, C., Peinemann, A., Bartenstein, P., Drzezga, A., & Conrad, B.
- Affiliations
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB)
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Siebner, Hartwig R.
- Venue
- European Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 726-736
- ISSN
- 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
- 1460-9568
- OpenAlex
- W1969706944
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- handwriting, writing speed, closed-loop motor control, kinaesthetic feedback, regional cerebral blood flow, primary sensorimotor cortex, premotor cortex, parietal cortex, putamen, supplementary motor area, precuneus
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Feedback, Female, Handwriting, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Skills, Movement, Nerve Net, Putamen, Time Factors, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Verbal Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review