The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incidence of major structural cardiac defects associated with increased nuchal translucency but normal karyotype
Abstract
Objective: To examine the association between increased nuchal translucency thickness and major cardiac defects in chromosomally normal fetuses. Setting: Tertiary referral unit for fetal medicine and fetal cardiology. Methods: During a 4‐year period (January 1997 to January 2001), detailed echocardiography was performed in 1319 chromosomally normal fetuses with increased nuchal translucency thickness at 10–14 weeks of gestation. The incidence of major cardiac defects was examined in relation to the fetal NT at the 10–14‐week scan. Results: Major cardiac defects were diagnosed in 60 (4.5%) of the 1319 fetuses. In fetuses with a nuchal translucency thickness in the range of 2.5–3.4 mm, the incidence of major cardiac defects was 2.5% (18/722; 95% confidence interval, 1.5–3.9) and in those with a nuchal translucency thickness ≥ 3.5 mm, it was 7% (42/597; 95% confidence interval, 5.1–9.4). Conclusion: Specialist echocardiography is indicated in all fetuses with increased nuchal translucency thickness because, in such fetuses, the incidence of major cardiac defects is substantially higher than in pregnancies with maternal diabetes, family history and exposure to drugs, where fetal echocardiography is widely considered to be necessary.Copyright © 2001 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Snijders, R., Noble, P., Sebire, N., Souka, A., & Nicolaides, K. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11280-6 · Cited by 1,572
Cited by
Donofrio, M. T., Moon-Grady, A. J., Hornberger, L. K., Copel, J. A., Sklansky, M. S., Abuhamad, A., Cuneo, B. F., Huhta, J. C., Jonas, R. A., Krishnan, A., et al. (2014) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000437597.44550.5d · Cited by 1,275
ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic screening examination of the fetal heart
Carvalho, J., Allan, L., Chaoui, R., Copel, J., DeVore, G., Hecher, K., Lee, W., Munoz, H., Paladini, D., Tutschek, B., et al. (2013) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.12403 · Cited by 681
Increased nuchal translucency with normal karyotype
Souka, A. P., von Kaisenberg, C. S., Hyett, J. A., Sonek, J. D., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2005) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.093 · Cited by 517
Self-citationRychik, J., Ayres, N., Cuneo, B., Gotteiner, N., Hornberger, L., Spevak, P. J., & Van Der Veld, M. (2004) · Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography · doi:10.1016/j.echo.2004.04.011 · Cited by 458
Rossi, A. C., & Prefumo, F. (2013) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000000015 · Cited by 224
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghi, T., Huggon, I. C., Zosmer, N., & Nicolaides, K. H.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 610-614
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W1994129298
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence of major structural cardiac defects associated with increased nuchal translucency but normal karyotype. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00584.x
- The paper
- Ghi, T., Huggon, I. C., Zosmer, N., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2001). Incidence of major structural cardiac defects associated with increased nuchal translucency but normal karyotype. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00584.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.