Accuracy of Ultrasonography at 11–14 Weeks of Gestation for Detection of Fetal Structural Anomalies: A Systematic Review
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review the literature concerning the efficacy of early ultrasonography (at 11-14 weeks of gestation) to identify fetal malformations. DATA SOURCES: A search in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed (January 2000 to December 2012). Keywords were: fetal anatomy, fetal echocardiography, nuchal translucency, fetal structural anomalies, fetal malformations, prenatal diagnosis, prenatal screening, and first-trimester ultrasonography. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria were: fetal anatomy examination at early ultrasonography and diagnosis of fetal malformations confirmed by postnatal or postmortem examination. Data abstracted were: sample size, location of structural defect, ultrasound modality, presence of multiple defects, and study population. Pooled detection rate was calculated for each malformation and compared with χ. Differences were considered statistically significant if P<.05. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: From 1,203 articles, 19 were included. Overall, we pooled 78,002 fetuses undergoing ultrasonography at 11-14 weeks, of which 996 were malformed, leading to prevalence of malformation of 12 per 1,000. The overall detection rate was 472 of 957 (51%). The highest detection rate was achieved for neck anomalies (92%), whereas limbs (34%), face (34%), and genitourinary anomalies (34%) were associated with the lowest detection rate. At 14 weeks of gestation or less, fetal echocardiography detected 53% of congenital heart disease compared with 43% by complete scan (P=.040). The use of Doppler did not improve the detection rate for congenital heart defects (52% compared with 44%, respectively; P=.11). Multiple defects were identified more frequently than isolated malformations (60% compared with 44%; P=.005). The detection rate was higher combining transabdominal and transvaginal techniques (62%) than either abdominal (51%) or transvaginal (34%; P<.001). Detection rate was higher in women at high risk (65%) than unselected population (50% P=.001). CONCLUSION: Because of the natural history of fetal defects and the late development of some organ systems, a number of fetal malformations remain undetected by early ultrasonography.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The combination of transabdominal and transvaginal examination resulted in a significantly higher detection rate (62% compared to 51% abdominal and 34% transvaginal, p < 0.001).
“Moreover, both transabdominal and transvaginal transducers need to be available, as results from a systematic review showed that the combination of transabdominal and transvaginal examination resulted in a significantly higher detection rate (62% compared to 51%—abdominal and 34%—transvaginal, p < 0.001, respectively) [18].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [18]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
D-Transposition of the Great Arteries
Villafañe, J., Lantin-Hermoso, M. R., Bhatt, A. B., Tweddell, J. S., Geva, T., Nathan, M., Elliott, M. J., Vetter, V. L., Paridon, S. M., Kochilas, L., et al. (2014) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1150 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Practice Bulletin No. 175: Ultrasound in Pregnancy
(2016) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000001815 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
(2018) · Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.1002/jum.14831 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
First and second trimester screening for fetal structural anomalies
Edwards, L., & Hui, L. (2018) · Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.siny.2017.11.005 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines
Boureka, E., Tsakiridis, I., Michos, G., Liberis, A., Giouleka, S., Mamopoulos, A., Kalogiannidis, I., & Dagklis, T. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16111695
- Authors
- Rossi, A. C., & Prefumo, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
- ORCID
- Prefumo, Federico
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1160-1167
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069496893
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Brescia) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
- Keywords
- first-trimester ultrasound, fetal structural anomalies, prenatal diagnosis, detection rate, nuchal translucency, fetal echocardiography, congenital heart disease, multiple congenital anomalies, transvaginal ultrasound, transabdominal ultrasound, high-risk pregnancy, first-trimester screening, Doppler ultrasound, limb malformations, genitourinary anomalies
- MeSH terms
- Congenital Abnormalities, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Ultrasonography, Prenatal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review