Cited by 125Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyGut microbiota and healthAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Digestive strategies of small hindgut fermenters

SAKAGUCHI, Ei·2003·Animal Science Journal

Abstract

Small mammalian herbivores have a limitation in their supply system of nutrients to their energy and protein demands because they need much more energy and protein per unit body mass than larger herbivorous animals. Therefore, small herbivores need to have characteristic strategies in their digestive systems to overcome the limitation of their small body mass compared with larger animals. Although small herbivorous mammals commonly have an enlarged cecum, the pattern of flow and mixing of digesta in the large intestine varies among them. Distinct separation of the larger fiber particles from smaller and liquid contents which are retained in the cecum can be recognized in some species. Coprophagy, practiced by many small herbivores, has nutritional significance providing a source of vitamins, amino acids, and other nutrients which are excreted with feces. Among coprophagous mammals, several species produce two types of feces: soft feces, which are eaten; and hard, which are not eaten. Soft feces contain more water than hard feces and dry matter includes more protein and less fiber. Coprophagic behavior must be supported by the colonic separation mechanism, which operates retrograde transport of fluid and fine particle digesta or bacteria trapped in the mucus, resulting in high density bacteria in the cecum contents, which is successively consumed as cecotroph. These mechanisms must be necessary for small herbivores to survive on the feed in their habitat.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1344-3941.2003.00124.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rabbit and chinchillas are true non-ruminant herbivores with a particular type of digestion called hind gut fermentation.

    “Rabbit and chinchillas are true non ruminant herbivores with a particular type of digestion, so called hind gut fermentation (Holtenius andBjörnhag, 1985: Davies andDavies 2003;Sakaguchi 2003).”

    From Anatomical Particularities of the Cecum in Rabbits and Chinchillas (2014) · cites this paper as Sakaguchi 2003

  • The cecum provides an anaerobic fermentation chamber for organisms such as Bacteroides spp. and various other organisms, which break down ammonia, urea, proteins and enzymes from the small intestine and cellulose.

    “The cecum provides an anaerobic fermentation chamber for organisms such as Bacteroides spp.and various another organisms, which breaks down ammonia, urea, proteins and enzymes from the small intestine and cellulose (Sakaguchi, 2003).”

    From Anatomical Particularities of the Cecum in Rabbits and Chinchillas (2014) · cites this paper as Sakaguchi, 2003

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SAKAGUCHI, E.
Affiliations
Okayama University (JP)
Corresponding author
SAKAGUCHI, Ei
Venue
Animal Science Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-09-16
Volume
74
Issue
5
Pages
327-337
ISSN
  • 1344-3941 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-0929
OpenAlex
W2115256784
Cited by
125
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Animal Science Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
hindgut fermentation, cecum, coprophagy, retrograde transport, large intestine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review