The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Importance of rhizodeposition in the coupling of plant and microbial productivity
Abstract
Summary: Plant roots influence the biological, chemical and physical properties of rhizosphere soil. These effects are a consequence of their growth, their activity and the exudation of organic compounds from them. In natural ecosystems, the linkages between inputs of carbon from plants and microbial activity driven by these inputs are central to our understanding of nutrient cycling in soil and the productivity of these systems. This coupling of plant and microbial productivity is also of increasing importance in agriculture, where the shift towards low‐input systems increases the dependence of plant production on nutrient cycling, as opposed to fertilizers. This review considers the processes by which plants can influence the cycling of nutrients in soil, and in particular the importance of organic inputs from roots in driving microbially mediated transformations of N. This coupling of plant inputs to the functioning of the microbial community is beneficial for acquisition of N by plants, particularly in low‐input systems. This occurs through stimulation of microbes that produce exoenzymes that degrade organic matter, and by promoting cycling of N immobilized in the microbial biomass via predation by protozoa. Also, plants increase the cycling of N by changes in exudation in response to nitrogen supply around roots, and in response to browsing by herbivores. Plants can release compounds in exudates that directly affect the expression of genes in microbes, and this may be an important way of controlling their function to the benefit of the plant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boschker, H. T. S., Nold, S. C., Wellsbury, P., Bos, D., de Graaf, W., Pel, R., Parkes, R. J., & Cappenberg, T. E. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/33900 · Cited by 556
Cited by
Carbon input by roots into the soil: Quantification of rhizodeposition from root to ecosystem scale
Pausch, J., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13850 · Cited by 1,010
KUZYAKOV, Y., & GAVRICHKOVA, O. (2010) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02179.x · Cited by 687
Plant-microbe-soil interactions in the rhizosphere: an evolutionary perspective
Lambers, H., Mougel, C., Jaillard, B., & Hinsinger, P. (2009) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-009-0042-x · Cited by 630
Unravelling rhizosphere–microbial interactions: opportunities and limitations
Singh, B. K., Millard, P., Whiteley, A. S., & Murrell, J. C. (2004) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2004.06.008 · Cited by 503
Rhizosphere priming effects on soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization
Zhu, B., Gutknecht, J. L. M., Herman, D. J., Keck, D. C., Firestone, M. K., & Cheng, W. (2014) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.04.033 · Cited by 440
Metadata
- Authors
- Paterson, E.
- Venue
- European Journal of Soil Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-10-17
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 741-750
- ISSN
- 1351-0754 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2389
- OpenAlex
- W2050627025
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Importance of rhizodeposition in the coupling of plant and microbial productivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1351-0754.2003.0557.x
- The paper
- Paterson, E. (2003). Importance of rhizodeposition in the coupling of plant and microbial productivity. European Journal of Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1351-0754.2003.0557.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.