Carbon input by roots into the soil: Quantification of rhizodeposition from root to ecosystem scale
Abstract
Despite its fundamental role for carbon (C) and nutrient cycling, rhizodeposition remains 'the hidden half of the hidden half': it is highly dynamic and rhizodeposits are rapidly incorporated into microorganisms, soil organic matter, and decomposed to CO 2 . Therefore, rhizodeposition is rarely quantified and remains the most uncertain part of the soil C cycle and of C fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. This review synthesizes and generalizes the literature on C inputs by rhizodeposition under crops and grasslands (281 data sets). The allocation dynamics of assimilated C (after 13 C-CO 2 or 14 C-CO 2 labeling of plants) were quantified within shoots, shoot respiration, roots, net rhizodeposition (i.e., C remaining in soil for longer periods), root-derived CO 2 , and microorganisms. Partitioning of C pools and fluxes were used to extrapolate belowground C inputs via rhizodeposition to ecosystem level. Allocation from shoots to roots reaches a maximum within the first day after C assimilation. Annual crops retained more C (45% of assimilated 13 C or 14 C) in shoots than grasses (34%), mainly perennials, and allocated 1.5 times less C belowground. For crops, belowground C allocation was maximal during the first 1-2 months of growth and decreased very fast thereafter. For grasses, it peaked after 2-4 months and remained very high within the second year causing much longer allocation periods. Despite higher belowground C allocation by grasses (33%) than crops (21%), its distributio…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nearly half of plant assimilated C is usually transferred to soil, either as rhizodeposition or root litter input after harvest.
“Nearly half of plant assimilated C is usually transferred to soil, either in the form of rhizodeposition (i.e., low molecular weight compounds) released from living roots and root litter input after harvest (Pausch & Kuzyakov, 2018).”
From Marginal land conversion to perennial energy crops with biomass removal enhances soil carbon sequestration (2022) · cites this paper as Pausch & Kuzyakov, 2018
Cites
A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes
Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E., & Schulze, E. D. (1996) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00333714 · Cited by 3,071 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Microbial formation of stable soil carbon is more efficient from belowground than aboveground input
Sokol, N. W., & Bradford, M. A. (2019) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-018-0258-6 · Cited by 891 · see citing works
Xu, Y., Zhou, J., Feng, W., Jia, R., Liu, C., Fu, T., Xue, S., Yi, Z., Guillaume, T., Yang, Y., et al. (2022) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12990 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“Though, most previous studies investigating the contribution of C4- derived C to SOC were conducted in grassland or agriculture ecosystems (Holder et al., 2019; Leifeld et al., 2021; Poeplau & Don, 2014; Zatta et al., 2014).”
ResultMortensen, E. Ø., Abalos, D., & Rasmussen, J. (2025) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2025.109578 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pausch, J., & Kuzyakov, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Bayreuth (DE)
- Kazan Federal University (RU)
- Corresponding author
- Pausch, Johanna
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-09-23
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2740255517
- Cited by
- 1,010
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 136 · 2025: 148 · 2024: 136 · 2023: 114 · 2022: 141 · 2021: 124 · 2020: 101 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
- Keywords
- rhizodeposition, belowground carbon allocation, root respiration, soil organic matter, carbon cycle, carbon allocation, annual crops, grassland, perennial grasses, soil carbon inputs, ecosystem carbon fluxes
- MeSH terms
- Carbon, Carbon Dioxide, Soil, Ecosystem, Plant Roots
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review