Cited by 1,010Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsPlant nutrient uptake and metabolism

Carbon input by roots into the soil: Quantification of rhizodeposition from root to ecosystem scale

Pausch, Johanna, Kuzyakov, Yakov·2018·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Despite its fundamental role for carbon (C) and nutrient cycling, rhizodeposition remains 'the hidden half of the hidden half': it is highly dynamic and rhizodeposits are rapidly incorporated into microorganisms, soil organic matter, and decomposed to CO 2 . Therefore, rhizodeposition is rarely quantified and remains the most uncertain part of the soil C cycle and of C fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. This review synthesizes and generalizes the literature on C inputs by rhizodeposition under crops and grasslands (281 data sets). The allocation dynamics of assimilated C (after 13 C-CO 2 or 14 C-CO 2 labeling of plants) were quantified within shoots, shoot respiration, roots, net rhizodeposition (i.e., C remaining in soil for longer periods), root-derived CO 2 , and microorganisms. Partitioning of C pools and fluxes were used to extrapolate belowground C inputs via rhizodeposition to ecosystem level. Allocation from shoots to roots reaches a maximum within the first day after C assimilation. Annual crops retained more C (45% of assimilated 13 C or 14 C) in shoots than grasses (34%), mainly perennials, and allocated 1.5 times less C belowground. For crops, belowground C allocation was maximal during the first 1-2 months of growth and decreased very fast thereafter. For grasses, it peaked after 2-4 months and remained very high within the second year causing much longer allocation periods. Despite higher belowground C allocation by grasses (33%) than crops (21%), its distributio…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gcb.13850

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nearly half of plant assimilated C is usually transferred to soil, either as rhizodeposition or root litter input after harvest.

    “Nearly half of plant assimilated C is usually transferred to soil, either in the form of rhizodeposition (i.e., low molecular weight compounds) released from living roots and root litter input after harvest (Pausch & Kuzyakov, 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pausch, J., & Kuzyakov, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Bayreuth (DE)
  • Kazan Federal University (RU)
Corresponding author
Pausch, Johanna
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-09-23
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
1-12
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2740255517
Cited by
1,010
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 136 · 2025: 148 · 2024: 136 · 2023: 114 · 2022: 141 · 2021: 124 · 2020: 101 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 2
FWCI
6.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Keywords
rhizodeposition, belowground carbon allocation, root respiration, soil organic matter, carbon cycle, carbon allocation, annual crops, grassland, perennial grasses, soil carbon inputs, ecosystem carbon fluxes
MeSH terms
Carbon, Carbon Dioxide, Soil, Ecosystem, Plant Roots

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review