The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Educating young people about drugs: a systematic review
Abstract
Aims. To assess the effectiveness of interventions directed at the prevention or reduction of use of illicit substances by young people or those directed at reducing harm caused by continuing use. Design. A systematic review was conducted. Reports were identified through electronic and hand searching and contact with known workers in the area. Studies were included if they reported evaluations of interventions targeting illicit drug use and provided sufficient detail of the intervention and design of the evaluation to allow judgements to be made of their methodological soundness. Meta‐analyses were conducted combining the data of the methodologically sound studies. Participants and settings targeted by interventions. Evaluations of interventions were included if their targeted audience included young people aged between 8 and 25 years. Identified evaluations were delivered in a range of settings including: schools and colleges; community settings; the family; medical/therapeutic settings; mass media. Measurements. Data extracted from each report included details of design, content and theoretical orientation of intervention, setting of the intervention, target audience, methods, population size, subject refusal rates, rates of attrition, outcome measures, length of follow‐up and findings, including statistical power. Findings. The majority of studies identified were evaluations of interventions introduced in schools and targeting alcohol, tobacco and marijuana simultaneously. These studies were methodologically stronger than interventions targeting other drugs and implemented outside schools. Meta‐analyses showed that the impact of evaluated interventions was small with dissipation of programme gains over time. Interventions targeting hard to reach groups have not been evaluated adequately. Conclusions. Effort needs to be directed towards the development of improved evaluative solutions to the problems posed by these groups. There is still insufficient evidence to assess the effectiveness of the range of approaches to drugs education; more methodologically sound evaluations are required. There is also a need to target interventions to reflect the specific needs and experiences of recipients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2009) · Cited by 2,013
Macleod, J., Oakes, R., Copello, A., Crome, I., Egger, M., Hickman, M., Oppenkowski, T., Stokes-Lampard, H., & Smith, G. D. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16200-4 · Cited by 639
Effective ingredients of school-based drug prevention programs
Cuijpers, P. (2002) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/s0306-4603(02)00295-2 · Cited by 466
School-based prevention for illicit drugs' use
Faggiano, F., Vigna-Taglianti, F., Versino, E., Zambon, A., Borraccino, A., & Lemma, P. (2005) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003020.pub2 · Cited by 265
(2006) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 224
Metadata
- Authors
- White, D., & Pitts, M.
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1475-1487
- ISSN
- 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0443
- OpenAlex
- W2127876608
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Educating young people about drugs: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.931014754.x
- The paper
- White, D., & Pitts, M. (1998). Educating young people about drugs: a systematic review. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.931014754.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.