Cited by 77Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Strange bedfellows: a critical view of pathological gambling and addiction

Shaffer, Howard J.·1999·Addiction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.941014451.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Commonalities between compulsive disorders and substance addiction have been identified in symptomatology, neurochemistry, and adaptations in brain function.

    “commonalities between compulsive disorders and substance addiction have been identified in terms of symptomatology, neurochemistry, and adaptations in brain function (Shaffer 1999; Holden 2001; Potenza 2006; Leeman and Potenza 2012).”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shaffer, H. J.
Corresponding author
Shaffer, Howard J.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-10
Volume
94
Issue
10
Pages
1445-1448
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2083189459
Cited by
77
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
gambling addiction, substance use disorders, comorbidities
MeSH terms
Dependency, Psychological, Gambling, Humans, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Behavior, Addictive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review