The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Communities Mobilizing for Change on Alcohol (CMCA): effects of a randomized trial on arrests and traffic crashes
Abstract
Aims: We previously reported effects of the CMCA intervention in reducing social and commercial access to alcohol by youth, and reducing alcohol use by 18‐20‐year‐olds. This paper reports on effects of CMCA on arrests and car crashes. Design: CMCA was a group‐randomized trial that implemented and evaluated a community‐organizing effort to change community policies and practices to reduce youth access to alcohol. Seven Midwestern communities were randomly assigned to the intervention condition and eight communities were assigned to the control condition. Intervention: For 2.5 years, a part‐time community organizer worked in each of the seven intervention communities with local public officials, enforcement agencies, alcohol merchants, the media, schools and other community groups to reduce youth access to alcohol. Measurement: We collected annual arrest and quarterly traffic crash data for the years 1987‐1995, providing a 6‐year baseline and 3 years of data during the intervention. Data were stratified into two target age groups (15‐17 and 18‐20) and a control group (age 21 and over). Analyses used random‐coefficient models because we had repeated observations for each unit of assignment in a group‐randomized trial with heterogeneous trends across communities. Findings: We observed net declines in the intervention communities for all arrest and traffic crash indicators. The decline was statistically significant for DUI arrests among 18‐20‐year‐olds and approached significance for DUI arrests and disorderly conduct violations among 15‐17‐year‐olds. Conclusions: Together with previously published results from this study, the results reported here suggest that a community‐organizing approach to limit youth access to alcohol may be effective, at least for selected end‐points and subgroups. We conclude that this approach may be useful, but that a longer intervention period is required to increase effectiveness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hingson, R., Heeren, T., Winter, M., & Wechsler, H. (2005) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144652 · Cited by 1,102
A Developmental Perspective on Alcohol and Youths 16 to 20 Years of Age
Brown, S. A., McGue, M., Maggs, J., Schulenberg, J., Hingson, R., Swartzwelder, S., Martin, C., Chung, T., Tapert, S. F., Sher, K., et al. (2008) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2007-2243d · Cited by 612
Evolving the future: Toward a science of intentional change
Wilson, D. S., Hayes, S. C., Biglan, A., & Embry, D. D. (2014) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x13001593 · Cited by 255
Cuijpers, P., van Straten, A., Warmerdam, L., & van Rooy, M. J. (2010) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-181 · Cited by 106
The Logic and Practice of the Prevention of Mental Disorders
Mendelson, T., Pas, E. T., Lee-Winn, A. E., Bradshaw, C. P., Rebok, G. W., Leis, J. A., & Mandell, W. (2019) · Public Mental Health · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190916602.003.0019
Metadata
- Authors
- Wagenaar, A. C., Murray, D. M., & Toomey, T. L.
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209-217
- ISSN
- 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0443
- OpenAlex
- W2017087552
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Communities Mobilizing for Change on Alcohol (CMCA): effects of a randomized trial on arrests and traffic crashes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.9522097.x
- The paper
- Wagenaar, A. C., Murray, D. M., & Toomey, T. L. (2000). Communities Mobilizing for Change on Alcohol (CMCA): effects of a randomized trial on arrests and traffic crashes. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.9522097.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.