Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Communities Mobilizing for Change on Alcohol (CMCA): effects of a randomized trial on arrests and traffic crashes

Wagenaar, Alexander C., Murray, David M., Toomey, Traci L.·2000·Addiction

Abstract

Aims: We previously reported effects of the CMCA intervention in reducing social and commercial access to alcohol by youth, and reducing alcohol use by 18‐20‐year‐olds. This paper reports on effects of CMCA on arrests and car crashes. Design: CMCA was a group‐randomized trial that implemented and evaluated a community‐organizing effort to change community policies and practices to reduce youth access to alcohol. Seven Midwestern communities were randomly assigned to the intervention condition and eight communities were assigned to the control condition. Intervention: For 2.5 years, a part‐time community organizer worked in each of the seven intervention communities with local public officials, enforcement agencies, alcohol merchants, the media, schools and other community groups to reduce youth access to alcohol. Measurement: We collected annual arrest and quarterly traffic crash data for the years 1987‐1995, providing a 6‐year baseline and 3 years of data during the intervention. Data were stratified into two target age groups (15‐17 and 18‐20) and a control group (age 21 and over). Analyses used random‐coefficient models because we had repeated observations for each unit of assignment in a group‐randomized trial with heterogeneous trends across communities. Findings: We observed net declines in the intervention communities for all arrest and traffic crash indicators. The decline was statistically significant for DUI arrests among 18‐20‐year‐olds and approached significance for DUI arrests and disorderly conduct violations among 15‐17‐year‐olds. Conclusions: Together with previously published results from this study, the results reported here suggest that a community‐organizing approach to limit youth access to alcohol may be effective, at least for selected end‐points and subgroups. We conclude that this approach may be useful, but that a longer intervention period is required to increase effectiveness.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.9522097.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
Wagenaar, A. C., Murray, D. M., & Toomey, T. L.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-02
Volume
95
Issue
2
Pages
209-217
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2017087552
Cited by
184
References
0
FWCI
6.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Communities Mobilizing for Change on Alcohol (CMCA): effects of a randomized trial on arrests and traffic crashes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.9522097.x
The paper
Wagenaar, A. C., Murray, D. M., & Toomey, T. L. (2000). Communities Mobilizing for Change on Alcohol (CMCA): effects of a randomized trial on arrests and traffic crashes. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.9522097.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.