The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Consistency of self‐administered and interview‐based Addiction Severity Index composite scores
Abstract
Aims. This study assesses the viability of a self‐administered version of the Addiction Severity Index for monitoring substance abuse patients' functioning. Design and measurements. Patients completed the ASI interview and a self‐administered questionnaire containing ASI composite items an average of 4 days apart. Composite scores from both formats were compared using correlations and mean differences. Participants and setting. Participants were 316 veterans entering substance abuse treatment in a US Department of Veterans Affairs medical center. Findings. Composite scores for alcohol, drug, psychiatric, family, legal and employment problems correlated 0.59‐0.87 across formats. Patients endorsed more drug use and psychiatric symptoms by questionnaire than by interview. Medical composite scores correlated only 0.47 across formats. Conclusions. This study and previous research suggest that a self‐administered questionnaire can be a feasible alternative to ASI interviews for monitoring substance abuse patients' treatment outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The efficacy of motivational interviewing: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials
Burke, B. L., Arkowitz, H., & Menchola, M. (2003) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.71.5.843 · Cited by 1,575
The Addiction Severity Index at 25: Origins, contributions, and transitions
McLellan, A. T., Cacciola, J. C., Alterman, A. I., Rikoon, S. H., & Carise, C. (2006) · The American Journal on Addictions · doi:10.1080/10550490500528316 · Cited by 450
Studies of the reliability and validity of the Addiction Severity Index
Mäkelä, K. (2004) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2003.00665.x · Cited by 295
Forsyth, J. P., Parker, J. D., & Finlay, C. G. (2003) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/s0306-4603(02)00216-2 · Cited by 206
Turner, B. J., Layden, B. K., Butler, S. M., & Chapman, A. L. (2013) · Archives of Suicide Research · doi:10.1080/13811118.2013.802660 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosen, C. S., Henson, B. R., Finney, J. W., & Moos, R. H.
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 419-425
- ISSN
- 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0443
- OpenAlex
- W2034031690
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consistency of self‐administered and interview‐based Addiction Severity Index composite scores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.95341912.x
- The paper
- Rosen, C. S., Henson, B. R., Finney, J. W., & Moos, R. H. (2000). Consistency of self‐administered and interview‐based Addiction Severity Index composite scores. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.95341912.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
