The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Natural and treatment‐assisted recovery from gambling problems: a comparison of resolved and active gamblers
Abstract
Aim. An exploratory study was conducted to understand the process of recovery from gambling problems. Design. Media recruitment was used to identify a resolved ( n = 43) and a comparison group of active pathological gamblers (n = 63). Participants. Participants showed evidence of significant problems related to gambling as well as high rates of co‐morbid mood and substance use disorders. The median length of resolution was 14 months with a range of 6 weeks to 20 years. Findings. Resolved gamblers reported a variety of reasons for quitting gambling, related mainly to emotional and financial factors. They did not experience a greater number of precipitating life events compared with active gamblers but did report an increase in positive and a decrease in negative life events in the year after resolution. Both resolved and active gamblers who had relatively more severe problems were more likely to have had treatment or self‐help involvement, whereas those with less severe problems, if resolved, were “naturally recovered”. Conclusions. The results support the need for a continuum of treatment options for problem gamblers and provide helpful information about recovery processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors.
Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.47.9.1102 · Cited by 8,596
Barriers to alcoholism treatment: reasons for not seeking treatment in a general population sample.
Grant, B. F. (1997) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol · doi:10.15288/jsa.1997.58.365 · Cited by 334
Cited by
Pathological gambling: Etiology, comorbidity, and treatment.
Petry, N. M. (2005) · doi:10.1037/10894-000 · Cited by 659
Motivational enhancement and self-help treatments for problem gambling
Hodgins, D. C., Currie, S. R., & el-Guebaly, N. (2001) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.69.1.50 · Cited by 299
Self-citationBarriers to Seeking Help for Gambling Problems: A Review of the Empirical Literature
Suurvali, H., Cordingley, J., Hodgins, D. C., & Cunningham, J. (2009) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-009-9129-9 · Cited by 261
Self-citationThe natural history of problem gambling from age 18 to 29
Slutske, W. S., Jackson, K. M., & Sher, K. J. (2003) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.112.2.263 · Cited by 230
A comparison of treatment‐seeking pathological gamblers based on preferred gambling activity
Petry, N. M. (2003) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00336.x · Cited by 195
Metadata
- Authors
- Hodgins, D. C., & El‐Guebaly, N.
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 777-789
- ISSN
- 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0443
- OpenAlex
- W2053075568
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Natural and treatment‐assisted recovery from gambling problems: a comparison of resolved and active gamblers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.95577713.x
- The paper
- Hodgins, D. C., & El‐Guebaly, N. (2000). Natural and treatment‐assisted recovery from gambling problems: a comparison of resolved and active gamblers. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.95577713.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.