Cited by 231Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesCrime Patterns and Interventions

The natural history of problem gambling from age 18 to 29

Slutske, Wendy S., Jackson, Kristina M., Sher, Kenneth J.·2003·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

Aggregate-level prevalences and individual-level developmental trajectories of untreated problem gambling were examined in an 11-year, 4-wave longitudinal study spanning the adolescent through young adult years. The past-year prevalences, 3-4 year incidences, and lifetime prevalences of problem gambling from adolescence through young adulthood were relatively stable at 2%-3%, 1%-2%, and 3%-5%, respectively. Despite the stability of the prevalences at the aggregate level, problem gambling appeared to be more transitory and episodic than enduring and chronic at the individual level. The present study is consistent with the limited evidence available on the natural history of problem gambling in the community in suggesting that natural recovery may be the rule rather than the exception.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.112.2.263

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-contacted participants at follow-up evaluations are likely to display higher rates of problem gambling and other pathological outcomes relative to their successfully contacted counterparts.

    “There is also some evidence that non-contacted participants at followup evaluations are likely to display higher rates of problem gambling and other pathological outcomes relative to their successfully contacted counterparts (Fröberg et al., 2015;Slutske et al., 2003).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Slutske, W. S., Jackson, K. M., & Sher, K. J.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2003-05
Volume
112
Issue
2
Pages
263-274
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2040618080
Cited by
230
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
13.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA11998, AA-07231, AA12383, R21AA012383, AA00264)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH60426, R01MH060426)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
problem gambling, natural history (disease), young adults, adolescents, prevalence, incidence, lifetime prevalence, developmental trajectories, natural recovery
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gambling, Humans, Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders, Male, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review