The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Development and validation of a scale measuring self‐efficacy of current and former smokers
Abstract
Aims. To develop and test the validity of a questionnaire measuring the confidence of current and former smokers in their ability to abstain from smoking in high‐risk situations. Design and participants. We collected qualitative data in a first mail survey in 115 smokers and ex‐smokers, and used these data to develop survey items. We collected quantitative data in a second mail survey in 529 smokers and ex‐smokers to finalize the instrument. Setting. General population in Geneva, Switzerland, 1995, 1997 and 1998. Findings. The study resulted in a two‐dimensional 12‐item scale: the “Smoking Self‐Efficacy Questionnaire” (SEQ‐12). The two six‐item subscales measure confidence in ability to refrain from smoking when facing internal stimuli (e.g. feeling depressed) and external stimuli (e.g. being with smokers). Internal consistency coefficients were high (“internal stimuli”: alpha = 0.95; “external stimuli”: alpha = 0.94). Test–retest intraclass correlation coefficients were high (0.95 and 0.93 for the two scales, respectively). In smokers, baseline self‐efficacy scores predicted smoking cessation at 16‐month follow‐up. Finally, the scale respected criteria of content‐ and construct validity. Conclusion. SEQ‐12 is a valid and reliable scale, which has applications in both research and clinical settings. It can also produce input data for computer systems that generate counselling reports tailored to the characteristics of each individual smoker.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A theory of organizational readiness for change
Weiner, B. J. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-67 · Cited by 2,268
The meaning and measurement of implementation climate
Weiner, B. J., Belden, C. M., Bergmire, D. M., & Johnston, M. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-78 · Cited by 260
Adherence in Internet-based interventions.
(2008) · PubMed Central · Cited by 215
Garrison, K. A., Pal, P., Rojiani, R., Dallery, J., O’Malley, S. S., & Brewer, J. A. (2015) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-015-0468-z · Cited by 74
“, craving, irritability, anxiety, depression, difficulty concentrating, appetite, insomnia, restlessness, impatience, constipation, dizziness, coughing, dreaming/ nightmares, nausea, sore throat); (iv) 4-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS; [40]) to measure the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as st…”
BackgroundPbert, L., Druker, S., Crawford, S., Frisard, C., Trivedi, M., Osganian, S. K., & Brewer, J. (2020) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-019-01273-w · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Etter, J., Bergman, M. M., Humair, J., & Perneger, T. V.
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 901-913
- ISSN
- 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0443
- OpenAlex
- W2064295383
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and validation of a scale measuring self‐efficacy of current and former smokers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.9569017.x
- The paper
- Etter, J., Bergman, M. M., Humair, J., & Perneger, T. V. (2000). Development and validation of a scale measuring self‐efficacy of current and former smokers. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.9569017.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.