Cited by 261Health Policy Implementation ScienceOrganizational Change and LeadershipHealth Sciences Research and Education

The meaning and measurement of implementation climate

Open access
Weiner, Bryan J, Belden, Charles M, Bergmire, Dawn M, Johnston, Matthew·2011·Implementation Science

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Climate has a long history in organizational studies, but few theoretical models integrate the complex effects of climate during innovation implementation. In 1996, a theoretical model was proposed that organizations could develop a positive climate for implementation by making use of various policies and practices that promote organizational members' means, motives, and opportunities for innovation use. The model proposes that implementation climate--or the extent to which organizational members perceive that innovation use is expected, supported, and rewarded--is positively associated with implementation effectiveness. The implementation climate construct holds significant promise for advancing scientific knowledge about the organizational determinants of innovation implementation. However, the construct has not received sufficient scholarly attention, despite numerous citations in the scientific literature. In this article, we clarify the meaning of implementation climate, discuss several measurement issues, and propose guidelines for empirical study. DISCUSSION: Implementation climate differs from constructs such as organizational climate, culture, or context in two important respects: first, it has a strategic focus (implementation), and second, it is innovation-specific. Measuring implementation climate is challenging because the construct operates at the organizational level, but requires the collection of multi-dimensional perceptual data from many expected innovation users within an organization. In order to avoid problems with construct validity, assessments of within-group agreement of implementation climate measures must be carefully considered. Implementation climate implies a high degree of within-group agreement in climate perceptions. However, researchers might find it useful to distinguish implementation climate level (the average of implementation climate perceptions) from implementation climate strength (the variability of implementation climate perceptions). It is important to recognize that the implementation climate construct applies most readily to innovations that require collective, coordinated behavior change by many organizational members both for successful implementation and for realization of anticipated benefits. For innovations that do not possess these attributes, individual-level theories of behavior change could be more useful in explaining implementation effectiveness. SUMMARY: This construct has considerable value in implementation science, however, further debate and development is necessary to refine and distinguish the construct for empirical use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1748-5908-6-78

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 95 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Zohar D Safety climate in industrial organizations -- theoretical and applied implications Journal of Applied Psychology 1980 65 96 102 7364709
  2. Dansereau F Cho J Yammarino FJ Avoiding the "Fallacy of the wrong level" - A within and between analysis (WABA) approach Group & Organization Management 2006 31 536 577 10.1177/105960110629113121786445 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weiner, B. J., Belden, C. M., Bergmire, D. M., & Johnston, M.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Weiner, Bryan J
Venue
Implementation Science
Published
2011-07-22
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
78-78
ISSN
1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153210627
Cited by
260
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
16.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA124402)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
implementation climate, innovation implementation, implementation effectiveness, construct validity, measurement, climate strength, organizational climate, organizational culture
MeSH terms
Cooperative Behavior, Diffusion of Innovation, Health Plan Implementation, Humans, Medical Oncology, Models, Theoretical, Organizational Innovation, Organizational Culture, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review