Cited by 66Ion channel regulation and functionMuscle Physiology and DisordersCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Mechanisms underlying changes of tetanic [Ca2+]i and force in skeletal muscle

WESTERBLAD, H., ALLEN, D. G.·1996·Acta Physiologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Force development in skeletal muscle is driven by an increase in myoplasmic free [Ca 2+] ([Ca 2+]i) due to Ca 2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR). The magnitude of [Ca 2+]i elevation during stimulation depends on: (a) the rate of Ca 2+ release from the SR, (b) the rate of Ca 2+ uptake by the SR, and (c) the myoplasmic Ca 2+ buffering. We have used fluorescent Ca 2+ indicators to measure [Ca 2+]i in intact, single fibres from mouse and Xenopus muscles under conditions where one or more of the above factors are changed. The following interventions resulted in increased tetanic [Ca 2+]i: β‐adrenergic stimulation, which potentiates the SR Ca 2+ release; application of 2,5‐di(tert‐butyl)‐1,4‐benzohydroquinone, which inhibits SR Ca 2+ pumps; application of caffeine, which facilitates SR Ca 2+ release and inhibits SR Ca 2+ uptake; early fatigue, where the rate of SR Ca 2+ uptake is reduced; acidosis, which reduces both the myoplasmic Ca 2+ buffering and the rate of SR Ca 2+ uptake. Reduced tetanic [Ca 2+]i was observed in late fatigue, due to reduced SR Ca 2+ release, and in alkalosis, due to increased myoplasmic Ca 2+ buffering. Force is monotonically related to [Ca 2+]i, but depends also on the myofibrillar Ca 2+ sensitivity and the maximum force cross‐bridges can produce. This is clearly illustrated by changes of intracellular pH where, despite a lower tetanic [Ca 2+]i, tetanic force is higher in alkalosis than acidosis due to increases of myofibrillar Ca 2+ sensitivity and maximum cross‐bridge force.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-201x.1996.196000.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The reduction in muscle force in myopathy mice is likely caused by deficient formation of force-generating actin-myosin cross bridges and/or disregulation of Ca2+ homeostasis.

    “This reduction in muscle force is likely caused by deficient formation of force-generating actin-myosin cross bridges and͞or disregulation of Ca 2؉ homeostasis.”

    From Increased mitochondrial mass in mitochondrial myopathy mice (2002) · cites this paper as [32]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WESTERBLAD, H., & ALLEN, D. G.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
WESTERBLAD, H.
Venue
Acta Physiologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-03
Volume
156
Issue
3
Pages
407-416
ISSN
  • 0001-6772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-201X
OpenAlex
W2128224982
Cited by
64
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Physiologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium release, sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium uptake, beta-adrenergic stimulation, caffeine, muscle fatigue, acidosis, alkalosis, intracellular pH, myofibrillar calcium sensitivity, single muscle fibers
MeSH terms
Animals, Calcium, Humans, Muscle Contraction, Muscle, Skeletal, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review