Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 199

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Neuromuscular adaptations during bilateral versus unilateral strength training in middle‐aged and elderly men and women

HÄKKINEN, K., KALLINEN, M., LINNAMO, V., PASTINEN, U‐M., NEWTON, R. U., KRAEMER, W. J.·1996·Acta Physiologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Twelve middle‐aged men and 12 middle‐aged women in the 50‐year‐old age group (M50; range 44–57 years; W50; 43–57), and 12 elderly men and 12 elderly women in the 70‐year‐old age group (M70; 59–75; W70; 62–75) volunteered as subjects in order to examine effects of 12‐week progressive heavy resistance strength training on electromyographic activity (EMG), muscle cross‐sectional area (CSA) of the quadriceps femoris and maximal concentric force in a one repetition maximum (1 RM) test of the knee extensor muscles. One half of the subjects in each group performed the knee extension (and flexion) exercises only bilaterally (BIL), while another half performed the exercises only unilaterally (UNIL). None of the subject groups demonstrated statistically significant changes in any of the 1 RM values during the 2 week control period with no training (between week ‐2 and 0) preceding the actual experimental training. However, the 12‐week training resulted in increases (P<0.05–0.001) in 1 RM values in each group so that the average relative increase of 19±12% (P<0.001) in bilateral 1 RM in all BIL trained subjects was greater (P<0.05) than that of 13±8% (P<0.001) recorded for all UNIL trained subjects. The average relative increases of 17±11% (P<0.001) and 14±14% (P<0.001) in unilateral 1 RM values of the right and left leg in all UNIL trained subjects were greater (P<0.05) than those of 10±18% (P<0.001) and 11±11% (P<0.001) recorded for all BIL trained subjects, respectively. The relative average increase of 19±19% (P<0.001) observed in the maximum averaged IEMG of both legs during the bilateral actions in all BIL trained subjects was greater (P<0.05) than that of 10±17% (P<0.05) recorded for all UNIL trained subjects. The relative increases of 14±12% (P<0.001) and 11±6% (P<0.001) recorded for the CSA in all BIL and UNIL trained subjects did not differ significantly from each others. The present findings suggest that progressive heavy resistance strength training leads to great increases in maximal dynamic strength of the trained subjects accompanied by both considerable neural adaptations and muscular hypertrophy not only in middle‐aged but also in elderly men and women. Both bilateral and unilateral exercises are effective to produce functional and structural adaptations in the neuromuscular system, although the magnitude of functional strength increase seems to be specific to the type of exercise used, further supporting the principle of specificity in the design of strength programmes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-201x.1996.523293000.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 199

Metadata

Authors
HÄKKINEN, K., KALLINEN, M., LINNAMO, V., PASTINEN, U., NEWTON, R. U., & KRAEMER, W. J.
Venue
Acta Physiologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-08
Volume
158
Issue
1
Pages
77-88
ISSN
  • 0001-6772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-201X
OpenAlex
W2106357467
Cited by
199
References
0
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuromuscular adaptations during bilateral versus unilateral strength training in middle‐aged and elderly men and women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-201x.1996.523293000.x
The paper
HÄKKINEN, K., KALLINEN, M., LINNAMO, V., PASTINEN, U., NEWTON, R. U., & KRAEMER, W. J. (1996). Neuromuscular adaptations during bilateral versus unilateral strength training in middle‐aged and elderly men and women. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-201x.1996.523293000.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.