The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electroporation: theory and methods, perspectives for drug delivery, gene therapy and research
Abstract
Electroporation designates the use of short high‐voltage pulses to overcome the barrier of the cell membrane. By applying an external electric field, which just surpasses the capacitance of the cell membrane, transient and reversible breakdown of the membrane can be induced. This transient, permeabilized state can be used to load cells with a variety of different molecules, either through simple diffusion in the case of small molecules, or through electrophoretically driven processes allowing passage through the destabilized membrane – as is the case for DNA transfer. Initially developed for gene transfer, electroporation is now in use for delivery of a large variety of molecules: From ions to drugs, dyes, tracers, antibodies, and oligonucleotides to RNA and DNA. Electroporation has proven useful both in vitro, in vivo and in patients, where drug delivery to malignant tumours has been performed. Whereas initial electroporation procedures caused considerable cell damage, developments over the past decades have led to sophistication of equipment and optimization of protocols. The electroporation procedures used in many laboratories could be optimized with limited effort. This review (i) outlines the theory of electroporation, (ii) discusses factors of importance for optimization of electroporation protocols for mammalian cells, (iii) addresses particular concerns when using electroporation in vivo, e.g. effects on blood flow and considerations regarding choice of electrodes, (iv) describes DNA electrotransfer with emphasis on use in the in vivo setting, and (v) sums up data on safety and efficacy of electroporation used to enhance delivery of chemotherapy to tumours in cancer patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
mRNA vaccines — a new era in vaccinology
Pardi, N., Hogan, M. J., Porter, F. W., & Weissman, D. (2018) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2017.243 · Cited by 4,667
Photodynamic therapy – mechanisms, photosensitizers and combinations
Kwiatkowski, S., Knap, B., Przystupski, D., Saczko, J., Kędzierska, E., Knap-Czop, K., Kotlińska, J., Michel, O., Kotowski, K., & Kulbacka, J. (2018) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2018.07.049 · Cited by 2,173
Therapeutic strategies for enhancing angiogenesis in wound healing
Veith, A. P., Henderson, K., Spencer, A., Sligar, A. D., & Baker, A. B. (2019) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.09.010 · Cited by 1,021
Intracellular Delivery by Membrane Disruption: Mechanisms, Strategies, and Concepts
Stewart, M. P., Langer, R., & Jensen, K. F. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00678 · Cited by 747
Teissie, J., Golzio, M., & Rols, M. P. (2005) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects · doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2005.05.006 · Cited by 622
Metadata
- Authors
- Gehl, J.
- Venue
- Acta Physiologica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-03-21
- Volume
- 177
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 437-447
- ISSN
- 0001-6772 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-201X
- OpenAlex
- W2140031668
- Cited by
- 973
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electroporation: theory and methods, perspectives for drug delivery, gene therapy and research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-201x.2003.01093.x
- The paper
- Gehl, J. (2003). Electroporation: theory and methods, perspectives for drug delivery, gene therapy and research. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-201x.2003.01093.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.