Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 349

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Esomeprazole improves healing and symptom resolution as compared with omeprazole in reflux oesophagitis patients: a randomized controlled trial

Kahrilas, P. J., Falk, G. W., Johnson, D. A., Schmitt, C., Collins, D. W., Whipple, J., D'Amico, D., Hamelin, B., Joelsson, B., FOR THE ESOMEPRAZOLE STUDY INVESTIGATORS·2000·Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Background: The pharmacologic profile of the new proton pump inhibitor esomeprazole has demonstrated advantages over omeprazole that suggest clinical benefits for patients with acid‐related disease. Methods: 1960 patients with endoscopy‐confirmed reflux oesophagitis (RO) were randomized to once daily esomeprazole 40 mg (n=654) or 20 mg (n=656), or omeprazole 20 mg (n=650), the standard recommended dose for RO, for up to 8 weeks in a US, multicentre, double‐blind trial. The primary efficacy variable was the proportion of patients healed at week 8. Secondary variables included healing and heartburn resolution at week 4, time to first resolution and sustained resolution of heartburn, and per cent of heartburn‐free days and nights. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. Results: Significantly more patients were healed at week 8 with esomeprazole 40 mg (94.1%) and 20 mg (89.9%) vs. omeprazole 20 mg (86.9%), using cumulative life table estimates, ITT analysis (each P < 0.05). Esomeprazole 40 mg was also significantly more effective than omeprazole for healing at week 4 and for all secondary variables evaluating heartburn resolution. The most common adverse events in all treatment groups were headache, abdominal pain and diarrhoea. Conclusion: Esomeprazole was more effective than omeprazole in healing and symptom resolution in GERD patients with reflux oesophagitis, and had a tolerability profile comparable to that of omeprazole.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2000.00856.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 349

Metadata

Authors
Kahrilas, P. J., Falk, G. W., Johnson, D. A., Schmitt, C., Collins, D. W., Whipple, J., D'Amico, D., Hamelin, B., Joelsson, B., & FOR THE ESOMEPRAZOLE STUDY INVESTIGATORS
Venue
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-10
Volume
14
Issue
10
Pages
1249-1258
ISSN
  • 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2036
OpenAlex
W2042158053
Cited by
349
References
0
FWCI
27.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Esomeprazole improves healing and symptom resolution as compared with omeprazole in reflux oesophagitis patients: a randomized controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2036.2000.00856.x
The paper
Kahrilas, P. J., Falk, G. W., Johnson, D. A., Schmitt, C., Collins, D. W., Whipple, J., D'Amico, D., Hamelin, B., Joelsson, B., & FOR THE ESOMEPRAZOLE STUDY INVESTIGATORS. (2000). Esomeprazole improves healing and symptom resolution as compared with omeprazole in reflux oesophagitis patients: a randomized controlled trial. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2036.2000.00856.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.