Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 221

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effects of CYP2C19 genotypic differences in the metabolism of omeprazole and rabeprazole on intragastric pH

Open access
Shirai, N., Furuta, T., Moriyama, Y., Okochi, H., Kobayashi, K., Takashima, M., Xiao, F., Kosuge, K., Nakagawa, K., Hanai, H., Chiba, K., Ohashi, K., Ishizaki, T.·2001·Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Background: Omeprazole is mainly metabolized in the liver by CYP2C19, a genetically determined enzyme, whereas rabeprazole is mainly reduced non‐enzymatically and partially metabolized by CYP2C19. The therapeutic effects of rabeprazole are therefore assumed to be less affected by an individual’s CYP2C19 status. Aim: To investigate the acid inhibitory effects and plasma levels of omeprazole and rabeprazole with reference to different CYP2C19 genotypes. Methods: Fifteen healthy volunteers took a daily dose of 20 mg of omeprazole or rabeprazole for 8 days. On post‐dose days 1 and 8, 24‐h profiles of intragastric pH were recorded and plasma concentrations of omeprazole, rabeprazole and their metabolites were determined. Results: After single and repeated doses of omeprazole, the intragastric pH values and plasma concentrations of omeprazole and its metabolites were significantly dependent on the CYP2C19 genotype. Significant differences in the same kinetic and dynamic parameters were also observed after single doses of rabeprazole. Although the plasma levels of rabeprazole differed among the different CYP2C19 genotype groups after repeated doses, no significant differences in intragastric pH values were observed. Conclusions: The acid inhibitory effects of omeprazole and rabeprazole are significantly dependent on the CYP2C19 genotype status, as well as on their intrinsic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics and dosing schemes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.01108.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 221

Metadata

Authors
Shirai, N., Furuta, T., Moriyama, Y., Okochi, H., Kobayashi, K., Takashima, M., Xiao, F., Kosuge, K., Nakagawa, K., Hanai, H., Chiba, K., Ohashi, K., & Ishizaki, T.
Venue
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-12-27
Volume
15
Issue
12
Pages
1929-1937
ISSN
  • 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2036
OpenAlex
W2000366696
Cited by
221
References
0
FWCI
6.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of CYP2C19 genotypic differences in the metabolism of omeprazole and rabeprazole on intragastric pH. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.01108.x
The paper
Shirai, N., Furuta, T., Moriyama, Y., Okochi, H., Kobayashi, K., Takashima, M., Xiao, F., Kosuge, K., Nakagawa, K., Hanai, H., Chiba, K., Ohashi, K., & Ishizaki, T. (2001). Effects of CYP2C19 genotypic differences in the metabolism of omeprazole and rabeprazole on intragastric pH. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.01108.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.