The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of CYP2C19 genotypic differences in the metabolism of omeprazole and rabeprazole on intragastric pH
Open accessAbstract
Background: Omeprazole is mainly metabolized in the liver by CYP2C19, a genetically determined enzyme, whereas rabeprazole is mainly reduced non‐enzymatically and partially metabolized by CYP2C19. The therapeutic effects of rabeprazole are therefore assumed to be less affected by an individual’s CYP2C19 status. Aim: To investigate the acid inhibitory effects and plasma levels of omeprazole and rabeprazole with reference to different CYP2C19 genotypes. Methods: Fifteen healthy volunteers took a daily dose of 20 mg of omeprazole or rabeprazole for 8 days. On post‐dose days 1 and 8, 24‐h profiles of intragastric pH were recorded and plasma concentrations of omeprazole, rabeprazole and their metabolites were determined. Results: After single and repeated doses of omeprazole, the intragastric pH values and plasma concentrations of omeprazole and its metabolites were significantly dependent on the CYP2C19 genotype. Significant differences in the same kinetic and dynamic parameters were also observed after single doses of rabeprazole. Although the plasma levels of rabeprazole differed among the different CYP2C19 genotype groups after repeated doses, no significant differences in intragastric pH values were observed. Conclusions: The acid inhibitory effects of omeprazole and rabeprazole are significantly dependent on the CYP2C19 genotype status, as well as on their intrinsic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics and dosing schemes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
SIM, S., RISINGER, C., DAHL, M., AKLILLU, E., CHRISTENSEN, M., BERTILSSON, L., & INGELMANSUNDBERG, M. (2006) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.clpt.2005.10.002 · Cited by 732
Pharmacogenetics, Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes, and Clinical Practice
Gardiner, S. J., & Begg, E. J. (2006) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.58.3.6 · Cited by 406
Shibli, F., Skeans, J., Yamasaki, T., & Fass, R. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · doi:10.1097/mcg.0000000000001382 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Shirai, N., Furuta, T., Moriyama, Y., Okochi, H., Kobayashi, K., Takashima, M., Xiao, F., Kosuge, K., Nakagawa, K., Hanai, H., Chiba, K., Ohashi, K., & Ishizaki, T.
- Venue
- Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-12-27
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1929-1937
- ISSN
- 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2036
- OpenAlex
- W2000366696
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of CYP2C19 genotypic differences in the metabolism of omeprazole and rabeprazole on intragastric pH. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.01108.x
- The paper
- Shirai, N., Furuta, T., Moriyama, Y., Okochi, H., Kobayashi, K., Takashima, M., Xiao, F., Kosuge, K., Nakagawa, K., Hanai, H., Chiba, K., Ohashi, K., & Ishizaki, T. (2001). Effects of CYP2C19 genotypic differences in the metabolism of omeprazole and rabeprazole on intragastric pH. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.01108.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.