Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 396

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Non‐erosive reflux disease (NERD) — acid reflux and symptom patterns

Open access
Martinez, S. D., Malagon, I. B., Garewal, H. S., Cui, H., Fass, R.·2003·Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Summary: Background: Recent reports suggest that patients with non‐erosive reflux disease (NERD) treated with anti‐reflux medications show lower symptom improvement rates than patients with erosive oesophagitis treated with the same medications. Aim: To determine the acid reflux and symptom patterns of patients with NERD in comparison with those with erosive oesophagitis and Barrett's oesophagus, and to identify different NERD subgroups. Methods: One hundred and forty‐nine consecutive patients seen for classic heartburn symptoms were evaluated for the study. Oesophageal mucosal injury was assessed by upper endoscopy and classified by Hetzel–Dent criteria. Patients with Hetzel–Dent grades 0–1 were considered to have NERD. The extent of oesophageal acid exposure was determined by ambulatory 24‐h oesophageal pH monitoring. Results: Seventy‐one patients were found to have NERD, 36 erosive oesophagitis and 42 Barrett's oesophagus. Compared with patients with erosive oesophagitis (75%) and Barrett's oesophagus (93%), those with NERD (45%) were significantly less likely to have an abnormal pH test (P = 0.0001). Patients with Barrett's oesophagus had the highest mean number of acid reflux events (210 ± 17.7), compared with those with erosive oesophagitis (139.7 ± 15.2) and NERD (95.3 ± 9.4) (P = 0.0001); however, the rate of perceived acid reflux events was similar and very low in all groups (NERD, 3.6%; erosive oesophagitis, 2.9%; Barrett's oesophagus, 2.17%). NERD‐positive patients (abnormal pH test) had a similar extent of oesophageal acid exposure to those with erosive oesophagitis. NERD‐positive patients were more likely to demonstrate a symptom index greater than 75% than NERD‐negative patients (normal pH test) (61.9% vs. 10.5%; P = 0.0001). In the NERD‐negative group, those with a negative symptom index reported having heartburn at pH < 4 only 12.7% of the time, compared with 70.7% of the time in those with a positive symptom index, despite a similar mean number of heartburn episodes. Conclusions: Patients with NERD commonly demonstrate a negative pH test. Acid reflux characteristics and symptom patterns suggest a heterogeneous group of patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01423.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 396

Metadata

Authors
Martinez, S. D., Malagon, I. B., Garewal, H. S., Cui, H., & Fass, R.
Venue
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-02
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
537-545
ISSN
  • 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2036
OpenAlex
W2135287136
Cited by
396
References
0
FWCI
19.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Non‐erosive reflux disease (NERD) — acid reflux and symptom patterns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01423.x
The paper
Martinez, S. D., Malagon, I. B., Garewal, H. S., Cui, H., & Fass, R. (2003). Non‐erosive reflux disease (NERD) — acid reflux and symptom patterns. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01423.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.