Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG on ileal pouch inflammation and microbial flora

Open access
Kuisma, J., Mentula, S., Jarvinen, H., Kahri, A., Saxelin, M., Farkkila, M.·2003·Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Summary: Background : Preliminary trials of probiotics in preventing recurrent chronic pouchitis have been encouraging. Aim : To investigate the efficacy of Lactobacillus GG supplementation as primary therapy for ileal pouch inflammation, and its effect on the microbial flora. Methods : Twenty patients, with a previous history of pouchitis and endoscopic inflammation, were recruited for a prospective, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of Lactobacillus GG supplementation (10 LGG, 10 placebo) in two gelatine capsules [(0.5–1) × 10 10 colony‐forming units/capsule] b.d. for 3 months. Quantitative bacterial culture of fresh faecal samples and biopsies taken from the pouch and afferent limb was performed before and after supplementation. Results : Lactobacillus GG supplementation changed the pouch intestinal flora by increasing the ratio of total faecal lactobacilli to total faecal anaerobes (P = 0.03) and enhancing the frequency of lactobacilli‐positive cultures in the pouch and afferent limb mucosal biopsy samples. However, only 40% of patients were colonized with Lactobacillus GG. No differences were observed between the groups with regard to the mean pouchitis disease activity index or the total anaerobes or aerobes of faecal or tissue biopsy samples. Conclusions : A single‐strain probiotic bacterium supplement of Lactobacillus GG changed the pouch intestinal bacterial flora, but was ineffective as primary therapy for a clinical or endoscopic response. More clinical trials are needed to evaluate the right placement and dosage of probiotics within a treatment regimen for pouchitis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01465.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
Kuisma, J., Mentula, S., Jarvinen, H., Kahri, A., Saxelin, M., & Farkkila, M.
Venue
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-02
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
509-515
ISSN
  • 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2036
OpenAlex
W2160610633
Cited by
282
References
0
FWCI
28.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG on ileal pouch inflammation and microbial flora. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01465.x
The paper
Kuisma, J., Mentula, S., Jarvinen, H., Kahri, A., Saxelin, M., & Farkkila, M. (2003). Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG on ileal pouch inflammation and microbial flora. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01465.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.