The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dietary protein/energy ratios for Atlantic salmon in relation to fish size: growth, feed utilization and slaughter quality
Abstract
Four extruded diets differing in protein/fat concentrations, 378/389 g kg−1, 425/346 g kg−1, 480/308 g kg−1 and 524/256 g kg−1 were tested in a digestibility trial and a growth study. Apparent digestibility of protein and fat were not significantly different among the diets when tested in 1-kg Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., in sea water. The diets represented a range of digestible protein to digestible energy ratios (DP/DE ratios) of 14.1, 16.4, 18.8 and 21.9 g MJ−1. The 138-day growth study was performed with triplicate groups of Atlantic salmon of 1.0 and 2.5 kg initial weight. Irrespective of size; growth, feed conversion ratio (FCR), nitrogen and energy retention were poorer in fish fed the diet with DP/DE ratio of 14.1 g MJ−1 compared with the fish fed the other diets. A DP/DE ratio of 16.4 g MJ−1 was sufficient to produce maximum growth for the large fish, while the DP/DE ratio of 18.8 g MJ−1 produced the highest growth in the small fish. In the large fish, the lowest FCR was obtained on a DP/DE ratio of 16.4 g MJ−1, while there was no clear difference in FCR within the small fish when diets of DP/DE ratios of 16.4–21.9 g MJ−1 were fed. The carcass-to-body ratio in the small fish decreased with decreasing DP/DE ratios. The fish fed the diet of 21.9 g MJ−1 had significantly lower fat and dry matter and higher protein content than fish of similar size fed the other diets. Increased dietary lipid content seemed to improve astaxanthin deposition in the small fish, while the large fish showed no significant differences in astaxanthin deposition due to dietary treatment. This study indicates that a DP/DE ratio of 14.1 g MJ−1 in high-energy diets for Atlantic salmon in sea water is below the optimal DP/DE ratio for growth and feed utilization, and that the optimal DP/DE ratio decreases with increasing fish weight. DP/DE ratios around 19 g MJ−1 for fish weighing 1 to 2.5 kg, and 16–17 g MJ−1 for fish weighing 2.5 to 5 kg, are suggested to be optimal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Exploring the nutritional demand for essential fatty acids by aquaculture species
Glencross, B. D. (2009) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/j.1753-5131.2009.01006.x · Cited by 800
Control of puberty in farmed fish
Taranger, G. L., Carrillo, M., Schulz, R. W., Fontaine, P., Zanuy, S., Felip, A., Weltzien, F.-A., Dufour, S., Karlsen, Ø., Norberg, B., et al. (2010) · General and Comparative Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.05.004 · Cited by 687
Krogdahl, Å., Bakke-McKellep, A. M., & Baeverfjord, G. (2003) · Aquaculture Nutrition · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2095.2003.00264.x · Cited by 654
Storebakken, T., Shearer, K. D., & Roem, A. J. (1998) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/s0044-8486(97)00284-6 · Cited by 379
Self-citationGlencross, B. D., Bachis, E., Betancor, M. B., Calder, P., Liland, N., Newton, R., & Ruyter, B. (2025) · Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture · doi:10.1080/23308249.2024.2388563 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Einen, O., & Roem, A. J.
- Venue
- Aquaculture Nutrition
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 115-126
- ISSN
- 1353-5773 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992248108
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dietary protein/energy ratios for Atlantic salmon in relation to fish size: growth, feed utilization and slaughter quality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2095.1997.00084.x
- The paper
- Einen, O., & Roem, A. J. (1997). Dietary protein/energy ratios for Atlantic salmon in relation to fish size: growth, feed utilization and slaughter quality. Aquaculture Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2095.1997.00084.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.