The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of food on the relative bioavailability of two oral formulations of posaconazole in healthy adults
Open accessAbstract
Aims This randomized, crossover, single‐dose study evaluated the relative oral bioavailability of posaconazole suspension and coprecipitate tablet formulations. Additionally, the study determined whether systemic exposure to posaconazole was affected by prandial status or by the fat content of a meal. Methods This was a randomized, open‐label, four‐way crossover, single‐dose study in 20 healthy men. Posaconazole pharmacokinetics were evaluated over 72 h following a single oral dose of posaconazole suspension (200 mg/5 ml) administered with a high‐fat meal, a nonfat breakfast, or after a 10 h fast, or posaconazole tablets (2 × 100 mg) administered with a high‐fat meal. Results The posaconazole suspension showed a significant increase in bioavailability compared with the tablet (increase in AUC(0,72 h) = 137% (90% confidence interval (CI) 119%, 156% and Cmax = 123% (90% CI 104%, 146%). The mean increases in AUC(0,72 h) and Cmax values were about 400% when administered with a high‐fat meal compared with administration of the suspension in the fasting state (AUC(0,72 h) 90% CI 343%, 448%; Cmax 90% CI 352%, 493%). Administration of the suspension with a nonfat meal enhanced exposure, resulting in an increase in AUC(0,72 h) of 264% (90% CI 231%, 302%) and in Cmax of 296% (90% CI 250%, 350%) relative to the fasted state. Conclusions The suspension formulation of posaconazole was associated with enhanced systemic exposure and increased relative bioavailability compared with the tablet. Food substantially enhanced the rate and extent of posaconazole absorption in healthy subjects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gibaldi, M., & Perrier, D. (1982) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b14095 · Cited by 4,093
Pfaller, M. A., Jones, R. N., Messer, S. A., Edmond, M. B., & Wenzel, R. P. (1998) · Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease · doi:10.1016/s0732-8893(97)00192-2 · Cited by 424
Sun, Q. N., Fothergill, A. W., McCarthy, D. I., Rinaldi, M. G., & Graybill, J. R. (2002) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.46.5.1581-1582.2002 · Cited by 365
Effects of Food on Clinical Pharmacokinetics
Singh, B. N. (1999) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/00003088-199937030-00003 · Cited by 364
Courtney, R., Pai, S., Laughlin, M., Lim, J., & Batra, V. (2003) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.47.9.2788-2795.2003 · Cited by 299
Self-citationIn Vitro Activities of New and Conventional Antifungal Agents against Clinical Scedosporium Isolates
Meletiadis, J., Meis, J. F. G. M., Mouton, J. W., Rodriquez-Tudela, J. L., Donnelly, J. P., Verweij, P. E., & the EUROFUNG Network (2002) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.46.1.62-68.2002 · Cited by 233
Barone, J. A., Koh, J. G., Bierman, R. H., Colaizzi, J. L., Swanson, K. A., Gaffar, M. C., Moskovitz, B. L., Mechlinski, W., & Van de Velde, V (1993) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.37.4.778 · Cited by 225
In Vitro Activities of Four Novel Triazoles against Scedosporium spp
Carrillo, A. J., & Guarro, J. (2001) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.45.7.2151-2153.2001 · Cited by 182
Zimmermann, T., Yeates, R. A., Laufen, H., Pfaff, G., & Wildfeuer, A. (1994) · European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf00199879 · Cited by 173
Pfaller, M. A., Messer, S. A., Hollis, R. J., & Jones, R. N. (2001) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.45.10.2862-2864.2001 · Cited by 146
Cited by
Pappas, P. G., Kauffman, C. A., Andes, D. R., Clancy, C. J., Marr, K. A., Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., Reboli, A. C., Schuster, M. G., Vazquez, J. A., Walsh, T. J., et al. (2016) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/civ933 · Cited by 4,200
Posaconazole Is Effective as Salvage Therapy in Zygomycosis: A Retrospective Summary of 91 Cases
van Burik, J.-A. H., Hare, R. S., Solomon, H. F., Corrado, M. L., & Kontoyiannis, D. P. (2006) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/500212 · Cited by 615
Antifungal therapeutic drug monitoring: established and emerging indications
Andes, D., Pascual, A., & Marchetti, O. (2009) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00705-08 · Cited by 490
Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Profile of Posaconazole
Li, Y., Theuretzbacher, U., Clancy, C. J., Nguyen, M. H., & Derendorf, H. (2010) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/11319340-000000000-00000 · Cited by 450
Jermain, S. V., Brough, C., & Williams, R. O. (2018) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.10.051 · Cited by 431
Metadata
- Authors
- Courtney, R., Wexler, D., Radwanski, E., Lim, J., & Laughlin, M.
- Venue
- British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-10-09
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 218-222
- ISSN
- 0306-5251 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2125
- OpenAlex
- W1736726786
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 4.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of food on the relative bioavailability of two oral formulations of posaconazole in healthy adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01977.x
- The paper
- Courtney, R., Wexler, D., Radwanski, E., Lim, J., & Laughlin, M. (2004). Effect of food on the relative bioavailability of two oral formulations of posaconazole in healthy adults. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01977.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
