Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Long-term efficacy and safety of cyclosporin in severe adult atopic dermatitis

BERTH-JONES, J., GRAHAM-BROWN, R.A.C., MARKS, R., CAMP, R.D.R., ENGLISH, J.S.C., FREEMAN, K., HOLDEN, C.A., ROGERS, S.C.F., OLIWIECKI, S., FRIEDMANN, P.S., LEWIS-JONES, M.S., ARCHER, C.B., ADRIAANS, B., DOUGLAS, W.S., ALLEN, B.R.·1997·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

A prospective, open, multicentre study was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with cyclosporin in adults with severe atopic dermatitis. Subjects were treated for a maximum of 48 weeks. For the first 8 weeks, cyclosporin was administered at 2.5 mg/kg per day. The dose was then adjusted according to response. Disease activity was monitored using the six-area, six-sign score and the proportion of skin involved. Pruritus and sleep disturbance were assessed using four-point scales. Response was further evaluated on a five-point scale. Adverse events, blood pressure and serum biochemistry were monitored. Tolerability was assessed on a five-point scale. One hundred subjects were enrolled and 65 completed 48 weeks of treatment. Withdrawals occurred due to remission (three), inadequate response (seven), protocol violations (11) and adverse events (14, of which seven were probably treatment related). Cyclosporin produced rapid and highly significant improvements in all indices of disease activity. Sixty-five subjects considered that they had shown a considerable improvement or complete clearance of disease. Most patients relapsed after cessation of treatment, but neither signs nor symptoms had returned to baseline severity 8 weeks later. Blood pressure and serum creatinine levels increased slightly, and in one subject renal impairment was a major factor contributing to withdrawal of the drug. Overall, 85 subjects rated the tolerability of cyclosporin as good or very good. The results indicate that cyclosporin has a place in the long-term treatment of severe atopic dermatitis provided that appropriate patients are selected and careful monitoring is performed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1997.d01-1146.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 175

Metadata

Authors
BERTH-JONES, J., GRAHAM-BROWN, R. A. C., MARKS, R., CAMP, R. D. R., ENGLISH, J. S. C., FREEMAN, K., HOLDEN, C. A., ROGERS, S. C. F., OLIWIECKI, S., FRIEDMANN, P. S., LEWIS-JONES, M. S., ARCHER, C. B., ADRIAANS, B., DOUGLAS, W. S., & ALLEN, B. R.
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
1997-01
Volume
136
Issue
1
Pages
76-81
ISSN
0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993377072
Cited by
175
References
0
FWCI
14.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term efficacy and safety of cyclosporin in severe adult atopic dermatitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2133.1997.d01-1146.x
The paper
BERTH-JONES, J., GRAHAM-BROWN, R. A. C., MARKS, R., CAMP, R. D. R., ENGLISH, J. S. C., FREEMAN, K., HOLDEN, C. A., ROGERS, S. C. F., OLIWIECKI, S., FRIEDMANN, P. S., LEWIS-JONES, M. S., ARCHER, C. B., ADRIAANS, B., DOUGLAS, W. S., & ALLEN, B. R. (1997). Long-term efficacy and safety of cyclosporin in severe adult atopic dermatitis. British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.1997.d01-1146.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.