The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cyclosporin in the treatment of patients with atopic eczema – a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Abstract
Objective To systematically assess the effectiveness of systemic cyclosporin in patients with severe atopic eczema. Study design Systematic review and meta‐analysis of controlled and uncontrolled trials. Electronic (MEDLINE, Cochrane databases) and hand search of published work. Independent standardized assessment of eligibility and data abstraction by two reviewers. Methods For the qualitative review data on study design, study population, methodology, results, tolerability and methodological quality was independently extracted by two reviewers. Qualitatively homogeneous studies were pooled using a random‐effects model. The mean relative change in objective disease severity was chosen as the main outcome measure for the quantitative analysis. Publication bias was explored by regressing treatment effect on sample size. Sensitivity analysis included meta‐regression of study‐specific covariates (inclusion of children, study type, concomitant topical therapy, study quality). Results Fifteen studies including 602 patients met the eligibility criteria. In all studies analysed, cyclosporin consistently decreased the severity of atopic eczema. Twelve studies appeared homogeneous enough to be pooled. After 2 weeks of treatment we found a dose‐related response with a pooled mean decrease in disease severity of 22% (95%‐CI 8–36%) under low‐dose cyclosporin ( 3 mg/kg) and 40% (95%‐CI 29–51%) at dosages 4 mg/kg. After 6–8 weeks the relative effectiveness was 55% (95%‐CI 48–62%). Conclusions Due to evidence of publication bias the quantitative results need to be interpreted with caution. Effectiveness of cyclosporin is similar in adults and children, but tolerability might be better in children. As data to adequately evaluate the long‐term effectiveness and safety of cyclosporin in patients with atopic eczema are unavailable, long‐term registries are encouraged.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)-a simple practical measure for routine clinical use
FINLAY, A. Y., & KHAN, G. K. (1994) · Clinical and Experimental Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2230.1994.tb01167.x · Cited by 5,586
Diagnostic features of atopic dermatitis
Hanifin, J. M., & Rajka, G. (1980) · Acta Dermato-Venereologica · doi:10.2340/00015555924447 · Cited by 5,086
Williams, H. C., Leung, D. Y. M., Thestrup‐Pedersen, K., & David, T. J. (2000) · Cited by 4,596
Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues
Elbourne, D. R., Altman, D. G., Higgins, J. P., Curtin, F., Worthington, H. V., & Vail, A. (2002) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/31.1.140 · Cited by 2,305
Severity Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis: The SCORAD Index
(2009) · Dermatology · doi:10.1159/000247298 · Cited by 2,273
QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN THE REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC LITERATURE1
GREENLAND, S. (1987) · Epidemiologic Reviews · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036298 · Cited by 1,644
Biological effects of cyclosporin A: A new antilymphocytic agent
Borel, J. F., Feurer, C., Gubler, H. U., & Stähelin, H. (1976) · Agents and Actions · doi:10.1007/bf01973261 · Cited by 1,509
A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta‐analysis
Macaskill, P., Walter, S. D., & Irwig, L. (2001) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.698 · Cited by 1,286
The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI): initial validation and practical use
LEWIS-JONES, M. S., & FINLAY, A. Y. (2010) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.1995.tb16953.x · Cited by 1,051
Williams, H., Robertson, C., Stewart, A., Aït-Khaled, N., Anabwani, G., Anderson, R., Asher, I., Beasley, R., Björkstén, B., Burr, M., et al. (1999) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70536-1 · Cited by 998
Cited by
Weidinger, S., & Novak, N. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00149-x · Cited by 1,908
Weidinger, S., Beck, L. A., Bieber, T., Kabashima, K., & Irvine, A. D. (2018) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-018-0001-z · Cited by 1,549
Wollenberg, A., Barbarot, S., Bieber, T., Christen‐Zaech, S., Deleuran, M., Fink‐Wagner, A., Gieler, U., Girolomoni, G., Lau, S., Muraro, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.14891 · Cited by 1,181
Wollenberg, A., Barbarot, S., Bieber, T., Christen‐Zaech, S., Deleuran, M., Fink‐Wagner, A., Gieler, U., Girolomoni, G., Lau, S., Muraro, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.14888 · Cited by 684
Commonality of the IL-4/IL-13 pathway in atopic diseases
Gandhi, N. A., Pirozzi, G., & Graham, N. M. H. (2017) · Expert Review of Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1080/1744666x.2017.1298443 · Cited by 493
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmitt, J., Schmitt, N., & Meurer, M.
- Venue
- Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03-22
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 606-619
- ISSN
- 0926-9959 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3083
- OpenAlex
- W2147391287
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 3.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cyclosporin in the treatment of patients with atopic eczema – a systematic review and meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.02023.x
- The paper
- Schmitt, J., Schmitt, N., & Meurer, M. (2007). Cyclosporin in the treatment of patients with atopic eczema – a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.02023.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.