Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cyclosporin in the treatment of patients with atopic eczema – a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Schmitt, J, Schmitt, N, Meurer, M·2007·Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

Abstract

Objective To systematically assess the effectiveness of systemic cyclosporin in patients with severe atopic eczema. Study design Systematic review and meta‐analysis of controlled and uncontrolled trials. Electronic (MEDLINE, Cochrane databases) and hand search of published work. Independent standardized assessment of eligibility and data abstraction by two reviewers. Methods For the qualitative review data on study design, study population, methodology, results, tolerability and methodological quality was independently extracted by two reviewers. Qualitatively homogeneous studies were pooled using a random‐effects model. The mean relative change in objective disease severity was chosen as the main outcome measure for the quantitative analysis. Publication bias was explored by regressing treatment effect on sample size. Sensitivity analysis included meta‐regression of study‐specific covariates (inclusion of children, study type, concomitant topical therapy, study quality). Results Fifteen studies including 602 patients met the eligibility criteria. In all studies analysed, cyclosporin consistently decreased the severity of atopic eczema. Twelve studies appeared homogeneous enough to be pooled. After 2 weeks of treatment we found a dose‐related response with a pooled mean decrease in disease severity of 22% (95%‐CI 8–36%) under low‐dose cyclosporin ( 3 mg/kg) and 40% (95%‐CI 29–51%) at dosages 4 mg/kg. After 6–8 weeks the relative effectiveness was 55% (95%‐CI 48–62%). Conclusions Due to evidence of publication bias the quantitative results need to be interpreted with caution. Effectiveness of cyclosporin is similar in adults and children, but tolerability might be better in children. As data to adequately evaluate the long‐term effectiveness and safety of cyclosporin in patients with atopic eczema are unavailable, long‐term registries are encouraged.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.02023.x

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Schmitt, J., Schmitt, N., & Meurer, M.
Venue
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03-22
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
606-619
ISSN
  • 0926-9959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3083
OpenAlex
W2147391287
Cited by
265
References
44
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cyclosporin in the treatment of patients with atopic eczema – a systematic review and meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.02023.x
The paper
Schmitt, J., Schmitt, N., & Meurer, M. (2007). Cyclosporin in the treatment of patients with atopic eczema – a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.02023.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.