Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 340

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence and epidemiology of toenail onychomycosis in diabetic subjects: a multicentre survey: ONYCHOMYCOSIS IN DIABETICS

Gupta, Konnikov, Macdonald, Rich, Rodger, Edmonds, Mcmanus, Summerbell·1998·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

The number of individuals diagnosed with diabetes mellitus is increasing. The diabetic may present with complications involving all systems of the body. While onychomycosis is often observed in diabetics, there have been no large studies on the prevalence of the condition in this patient group. We examined the prevalence of onychomycosis in diabetics attending diabetes and dermatology clinics in London, Ontario, Canada and Boston, MA, U.S.A. Diabetic subjects seen in dermatology offices were for unrelated dermatoses; those referred specifically for the management of onychomycosis were excluded from the sample. A total of 550 diabetic subjects was evaluated (283 males and 267 females), age 56.1 +/- 0.7 years (mean +/- SEM). Patients with type I diabetes constituted 34% of the sample. The racial origin was: 531 Caucasians, 17 Asians, one African-American and one American-Indian. Abnormal-appearing nails and mycological evidence of onychomycosis (mostly due to dermatophytes) were present in 253 (46%) and 144 (26%), respectively, of 550 subjects. The development of onychomycosis was significantly correlated with age (P < 0.0001) and male gender (P < 0.0001). Males were 2.99 times more likely to have onychomycosis compared with females (95% confidence interval, CI 1.94-4 61). After controlling for age and sex, the risk odds ratio for diabetic subjects to have toenail onychomycosis was 2.77 times compared with normal individuals (95% CI 2.15-3.57). After controlling for age and sex, a stepwise logistic regression demonstrated that significant predictors for onychomycosis included a family history of onychomycosis (P = 0.0001), concurrent intake of immunosuppressive therapy (P = 0.035) and peripheral vascular disease (P = 0.023). Toenail onychomycosis was present in 26% of the sample and is projected to affect approximately one-third of subjects with diabetes. Predisposing factors include increasing age, male gender, family history of onychomycosis, concurrent intake of immunosuppressive agents and peripheral vascular disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02464.x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 340

Metadata

Authors
Gupta, Konnikov, Macdonald, Rich, Rodger, Edmonds, Mcmanus, & Summerbell
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
1998-10
Volume
139
Issue
4
Pages
665-671
ISSN
0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1516318525
Cited by
340
References
10
FWCI
5.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence and epidemiology of toenail onychomycosis in diabetic subjects: a multicentre survey: ONYCHOMYCOSIS IN DIABETICS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02464.x
The paper
Gupta, Konnikov, Macdonald, Rich, Rodger, Edmonds, Mcmanus, & Summerbell. (1998). Prevalence and epidemiology of toenail onychomycosis in diabetic subjects: a multicentre survey: ONYCHOMYCOSIS IN DIABETICS. British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02464.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.