The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Prevalence of Foot Ulceration and its Correlates in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: a Population‐based Study
Abstract
The prevalence of peripheral neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, and foot ulceration in Type 2 diabetic patients in the community were determined in a community‐based study. Eight hundred and eleven subjects (404 male, 407 female, mean age 65.4 (range 34–90) years, diabetes duration 7.4 (0–50) years) from 37 general practices in three UK cities were studied. Neuropathy was diagnosed clinically using modified neuropathy disability scores which were ascertained using structured interviews and clinical examinations by one observer in each city. Peripheral vascular disease was diagnosed if a history of revascularization was present or ≥ 2 foot pulses were absent. History of current or previous foot ulceration was recorded. The prevalence of neuropathy was 41.6% (95% confidence limits 38.3–44.9%) and the prevalence of PVD, 11% (9.1–13.7%). Forty‐eight percent of neuropathic patients reported significant neuropathic symptoms. Forty‐three patients (5.3% (3.8‐6.8%)) had current or past foot ulcers; 20 of these were pure neuropathic ulcers, 13 neuroischaemic, 5 pure vascular, and 5 were unclassified. Multiple logistic regression showed history of amputation, neuropathy disability score, and peripheral vascular disease to be significantly associated with foot ulceration after adjusting for age and diabetes duration. A substantial proportion of Type 2 diabetic patients, often elderly patients who do not attend hospitals, suffered from peripheral neuropathy and peripheral vascular disease. These patients are at risk of foot ulceration and may benefit from preventive footcare.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Young, M. J., Boulton, A. J. M., Macleod, A. F., Williams, D. R. R., & Sonksen, P. H. (1993) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/bf00400697 · Cited by 1,502
Self-citationPirart, J. (1978) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.1.3.168 · Cited by 1,290
Cited by
Jeffcoate, W. J., & Harding, K. G. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13169-8 · Cited by 1,050
Boulton, A. J. M., Malik, R. A., Arezzo, J. C., & Sosenko, J. M. (2004) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.27.6.1458 · Cited by 913
Self-citationDaousi, C., MacFarlane, I. A., Woodward, A., Nurmikko, T. J., Bundred, P. E., & Benbow, S. J. (2004) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01271.x · Cited by 454
The current burden of diabetic foot disease
Edmonds, M., Manu, C., & Vas, P. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma · doi:10.1016/j.jcot.2021.01.017 · Cited by 437
Gupta, Konnikov, Macdonald, Rich, Rodger, Edmonds, Mcmanus, & Summerbell (1998) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02464.x · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumar, S., Ashe, H. A., Parnell, L. N., Fernando, D. J. S., Tsigos, C., Young, R. J., Ward, J. D., & Boulton, A. J. M.
- Venue
- Diabetic Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 480-484
- ISSN
- 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5491
- OpenAlex
- W2149411246
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Prevalence of Foot Ulceration and its Correlates in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: a Population‐based Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1464-5491.1994.tb00310.x
- The paper
- Kumar, S., Ashe, H. A., Parnell, L. N., Fernando, D. J. S., Tsigos, C., Young, R. J., Ward, J. D., & Boulton, A. J. M. (1994). The Prevalence of Foot Ulceration and its Correlates in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: a Population‐based Study. Diabetic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.1994.tb00310.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.