Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 363

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Prevalence of Foot Ulceration and its Correlates in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: a Population‐based Study

Kumar, S., Ashe, H.A., Parnell, L.N., Fernando, D.J.S., Tsigos, C., Young, R.J., Ward, J.D., Boulton, A.J.M.·1994·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

The prevalence of peripheral neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, and foot ulceration in Type 2 diabetic patients in the community were determined in a community‐based study. Eight hundred and eleven subjects (404 male, 407 female, mean age 65.4 (range 34–90) years, diabetes duration 7.4 (0–50) years) from 37 general practices in three UK cities were studied. Neuropathy was diagnosed clinically using modified neuropathy disability scores which were ascertained using structured interviews and clinical examinations by one observer in each city. Peripheral vascular disease was diagnosed if a history of revascularization was present or ≥ 2 foot pulses were absent. History of current or previous foot ulceration was recorded. The prevalence of neuropathy was 41.6% (95% confidence limits 38.3–44.9%) and the prevalence of PVD, 11% (9.1–13.7%). Forty‐eight percent of neuropathic patients reported significant neuropathic symptoms. Forty‐three patients (5.3% (3.8‐6.8%)) had current or past foot ulcers; 20 of these were pure neuropathic ulcers, 13 neuroischaemic, 5 pure vascular, and 5 were unclassified. Multiple logistic regression showed history of amputation, neuropathy disability score, and peripheral vascular disease to be significantly associated with foot ulceration after adjusting for age and diabetes duration. A substantial proportion of Type 2 diabetic patients, often elderly patients who do not attend hospitals, suffered from peripheral neuropathy and peripheral vascular disease. These patients are at risk of foot ulceration and may benefit from preventive footcare.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1994.tb00310.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 363

Metadata

Authors
Kumar, S., Ashe, H. A., Parnell, L. N., Fernando, D. J. S., Tsigos, C., Young, R. J., Ward, J. D., & Boulton, A. J. M.
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-06
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
480-484
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W2149411246
Cited by
363
References
2
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Prevalence of Foot Ulceration and its Correlates in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: a Population‐based Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1464-5491.1994.tb00310.x
The paper
Kumar, S., Ashe, H. A., Parnell, L. N., Fernando, D. J. S., Tsigos, C., Young, R. J., Ward, J. D., & Boulton, A. J. M. (1994). The Prevalence of Foot Ulceration and its Correlates in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: a Population‐based Study. Diabetic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.1994.tb00310.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.