Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 195

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The clinical genetics of hidradenitis suppurativa revisited

Von Der Werth, J.M., Williams, H.C., Raeburn, J.A.·2000·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

A familial form of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) with autosomal dominant inheritance was described in a study conducted 15 years ago in Nottingham but has not been systematically confirmed elsewhere. Prior to commencing molecular genetic studies, we wanted to test the validity of the previous study by assessing its reproducibility on the basis of a strict, newly devised disease definition for HS. We were also interested whether new cases of the disease had arisen meantime in the study group as should be expected for an autosomal dominant disease. We reviewed 14 surviving probands and their families. Seven of these probands had previously been noted to have a positive family history whereas the others had been classified as having a negative or possible family history. One hundred and thirty-two family members were assessed for their respective disease status. Participants were initially contacted by telephone or letter, and those who acknowledged a history of at least one previous boil were invited for a personal examination and interview. Only personally examined individuals were classified as a case. Twenty-eight relatives with HS were detected in total, and 27 of these were in the group previously labelled family history positive. Nine of these cases had not been detected in the previous study and in at least seven of these the disease had developed after the previous study had been conducted. Only twice did our criteria fail to confirm cases that had been labelled as HS in the previous study. Both times we classified the patients as 'possibly affected'. A further 16 relatives were judged to be possibly affected. In the group with positive family history we found 10 affected and nine possibly affected individuals among 37 surviving first-degree relatives of HS sufferers. Our findings support the concept of a familial form of HS with autosomal dominant inheritance. An insufficiently sensitive disease definition, a variable degree of gene penetrance and possibly a hormonal influence on gene expression may explain the reduced risk to first-degree relatives, which falls short of the expected 50% mark. Molecular genetic studies to clarify whether one or more gene(s) are involved in HS are now necessary and have been commenced.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03476.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 195

Metadata

Authors
Von Der Werth, J. M., Williams, H. C., & Raeburn, J. A.
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2000-05
Volume
142
Issue
5
Pages
947-953
ISSN
0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151772152
Cited by
195
References
0
FWCI
5.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The clinical genetics of hidradenitis suppurativa revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03476.x
The paper
Von Der Werth, J. M., Williams, H. C., & Raeburn, J. A. (2000). The clinical genetics of hidradenitis suppurativa revisited. British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03476.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.