Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 318

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The natural history of hidradenitis suppurativa

Von Der Werth, JM, Williams, HC·2000·Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

Abstract

Aim To investigate aspects of the natural history of hidradenitis. Background The natural history of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is not well known. There is incomplete published data on the average age of disease onset, progression of the disease, average monthly incidence and duration of boils, and factors that relieve or exacerbate disease symptoms. Study design Questionnaire‐based survey among HS patients identified from hospital records of three hospitals in Nottinghamshire, UK. Results One hundred and ten of 156 questionnaires (70.5%) were returned, 93 from females and 17 from males. The average patient’s age was 40.1 years and the average reported age of disease onset was 21.8 years. At the time of the survey patients had suffered an average disease duration of 18.8 years. Most patients (98 of 110) still had experienced active disease within the past year. There was some evidence that in women the condition has a tendency to ease or subside after the menopause. Forty‐four per cent of women felt that their condition was aggravated by menstruation. Thirty‐eight per cent of patients gave a positive family history of the disorder. The average duration of painful boils was 6.9 days. In addition, 62% of patients acknowledged the presence of permanently painful boils that failed to subside. Patients developed a median of two boils per month. Factors that could aggravate the condition were primarily sweating or heat, stress or fatigue and tight clothing or friction. Factors that could improve the condition consisted largely of a variety of medical treatments and a number of life‐style measures, such as swimming or baths. Twenty‐four per cent of patients had failed to find anything at all to help their condition, despite an average disease duration of almost 19 years. Conclusions The study highlights several of the factors that make HS one of the most distressing dermatological diseases, such as the average monthly incidence of painful lesions, their average duration and the chronicity of the disease. It seems striking that the mean duration of an HS boil (6.9 days) roughly equals the duration of an average course of antibiotics. The postulated response of HS to oral antibiotics may thus simply have its explanation in the natural history of the condition itself.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1468-3083.2000.00087.x

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 318

Metadata

Authors
Von Der Werth, J., & Williams, H.
Venue
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-09
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
389-392
ISSN
  • 0926-9959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3083
OpenAlex
W1975884572
Cited by
318
References
12
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The natural history of hidradenitis suppurativa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1468-3083.2000.00087.x
The paper
Von Der Werth, J., & Williams, H. (2000). The natural history of hidradenitis suppurativa. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3083.2000.00087.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.