The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epidemiology of acne in the general population: the risk of smoking
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acne is a common skin disorder, but epidemiological data from the general population obtained by examination are scarce. Clinical experience suggests an association between smoking and acne, although confirmatory evidence from appropriate studies is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and demographic factors of acne in a general population sample and to investigate the association of smoking and acne on a qualitative and quantitative level. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 896 citizens (aged 1--87 years, median 42) of the City of Hamburg were dermatologically examined. The prevalence and severity of acne were recorded and further information on demographic variables, medical history, and alcohol and cigarette consumption were obtained by a standardized interview. RESULTS: According to the clinical examination, acne was present in 26.8% overall, and was more prevalent in men (29.9%) than women (23.7%) (odds ratio, OR 1.37, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.01--1.87). Prevalence followed a significant linear trend over age with peak prevalence between 14 and 29 years (P < 0.001). The reported age at onset was significantly lower in women than men (P = 0.015). According to multiple logistic regression analyses acne prevalence was significantly higher in active smokers (40.8%, OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.40--2.99) as compared with non-smokers (25.2%). A significant linear relationship between acne prevalence and number of cigarettes smoked daily was obtained (trend test: P < 0.0001). In addition, a significant dose-dependent relationship between acne severity and daily cigarette consumption was shown by linear regression analysis (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Smoking is a clinically important contributory factor to acne prevalence and severity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bechelli, L. M., Haddad, N., Pimenta, W. P., Pagnano, P. M. G., Melchior, Jr., Fregnan, R. C., Zanin, L. C., & Arenas, A. (2009) · Dermatologica · doi:10.1159/000250144 · Cited by 111
Cited by
Williams, H. C., Dellavalle, R. P., & Garner, S. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60321-8 · Cited by 1,126
Tuchayi, S. M., Makrantonaki, E., Ganceviciene, R., Dessinioti, C., Feldman, S. R., & Zouboulis, C. C. (2015) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2015.29 · Cited by 432
Effects of air pollution on the skin: A review
Kathuria, S., Puri, P., Nandar, S., & Ramesh, V (2017) · Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology · doi:10.4103/0378-6323.199579 · Cited by 282
Tsuji, G., Takahara, M., Uchi, H., Takeuchi, S., Mitoma, C., Moroi, Y., & Furue, M. (2011) · Journal of Dermatological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jdermsci.2010.10.017 · Cited by 209
Frontiers in sebaceous gland biology and pathology
Zouboulis, C. C., Baron, J. M., Böhm, M., Kippenberger, S., Kurzen, H., Reichrath, J., & Thielitz, A. (2008) · Experimental Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0625.2008.00725.x · Cited by 205
Metadata
- Authors
- Schafer, T., Nienhaus, A., Vieluf, D., Berger, J., & Ring, J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Dermatology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 100-104
- ISSN
- 0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2133
- OpenAlex
- W2161961657
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiology of acne in the general population: the risk of smoking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04290.x
- The paper
- Schafer, T., Nienhaus, A., Vieluf, D., Berger, J., & Ring, J. (2001). Epidemiology of acne in the general population: the risk of smoking. British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04290.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.