Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 354

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A new G‐CSF‐supported combination chemotherapy, LSG15, for adult T‐cell leukaemia‐lymphoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9303

Open access
Yamada, Yasuaki, Tomonaga, Masao, Fukuda, Haruhiko, Hanada, Shuichi, Utsunomiya, Atae, Tara, Mitsutoshi, Sano, Masayuki, Ikeda, Shuichi, Takatsuki, Kiyoshi, Kozuru, Mitsuo, Araki, Koichi, Kawano, Fumio, Niimi, Miyuki, Tobinai, Kensei, Hotta, Tomomitsu, Shimoyama, Masanori, Other Members Of The Lymphoma Study Group of The Japan Clini·2001·British Journal of Haematology

Abstract

This phase II trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy of a new granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF)‐supported multi‐agent chemotherapy protocol, LSG15, for aggressive adult T‐cell leukaemia‐lymphoma (ATL). Ninety‐six previously untreated patients with aggressive ATL were enrolled and grouped as: acute type (58), lymphoma type (28) and unfavourable chronic type (10). Therapy consisted of seven cycles of VCAP (vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone), AMP (doxorubicin, ranimustine and prednisone) and VECP (vindesine, etoposide, carboplatin and prednisone). G‐CSF was administered during the intervals between chemotherapy until neutrophil reconstitution was achieved. Eighty‐one per cent of the 93 eligible patients responded [95% confidence interval (CI), 71·1–88·1%], with 33 patients obtaining complete response (35·5%) and 42 obtaining partial response (45·2%). The median survival time (MST) after registration was 13 months and the median follow‐up duration of the 20 surviving patients was 4·2 years (range 2·8–5·6). Overall survival at 2 years was estimated to be 31·3% (95% CI, 22·0–40·5%). Grade 4 haematological toxicity of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 65·3% and 52·6% of the patients respectively, but grade 4 non‐haematological toxicity was observed in only one patient. LSG15 is feasible with mild non‐haematological toxicity and improved the clinical outcome of ATL patients. MST and overall survival at 2 years were superior to those obtained by our previous trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.02737.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 354

Metadata

Authors
Yamada, Y., Tomonaga, M., Fukuda, H., Hanada, S., Utsunomiya, A., Tara, M., Sano, M., Ikeda, S., Takatsuki, K., Kozuru, M., Araki, K., Kawano, F., Niimi, M., Tobinai, K., Hotta, T., Shimoyama, M., & Other Members Of The Lymphoma Study Group of The Japan Clini
Venue
British Journal of Haematology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-05
Volume
113
Issue
2
Pages
375-382
ISSN
  • 0007-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2141
OpenAlex
W2170522323
Cited by
354
References
1
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new G‐CSF‐supported combination chemotherapy, LSG15, for adult T‐cell leukaemia‐lymphoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9303. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.02737.x
The paper
Yamada, Y., Tomonaga, M., Fukuda, H., Hanada, S., Utsunomiya, A., Tara, M., Sano, M., Ikeda, S., Takatsuki, K., Kozuru, M., Araki, K., Kawano, F., Niimi, M., Tobinai, K., Hotta, T., Shimoyama, M., & Other Members Of The Lymphoma Study Group of The Japan Clini. (2001). A new G‐CSF‐supported combination chemotherapy, LSG15, for adult T‐cell leukaemia‐lymphoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9303. British Journal of Haematology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.02737.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.