The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Adenocarcinomas of the distal oesophagus and gastric cardia are one clinical entity
Open accessAbstract
Background: Adenocarcinomas of the distal third of the oesophagus and the gastric cardia have similar characteristics but different staging criteria are being used. In the present study the question is addressed whether these tumours should be regarded and staged as one clinical entity. Methods: From January 1987 to January 1997, 252 patients with an adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus (n = 111) or gastric cardia (n = 141) underwent transhiatal resection. Pathology, pathological tumour node metastasis (pTNM) stage and survival were analysed retrospectively, and a comparison was made between tumours of the oesophagus and gastric cardia. Results: Barrett's epithelium was diagnosed in 54 per cent of oesophageal adenocarcinomas compared with 13 per cent of adenocarcinomas of the gastric cardia (P < 0·001). Oesophageal carcinomas had a more favourable pT stage, fewer positive locoregional lymph nodes (pN1–2 56 versus 62 per cent; P = 0·3), but more distant metastases accounted for by positive lymph nodes around the coeliac axis (pM1 19 versus 4 per cent; P < 0·001). Five-year overall survival (26 versus 27 per cent; P = 0·9) and survival according to tumour stage were no different between the groups. Multivariate analysis showed that the location of the primary tumour was not an independent prognostic factor. Conclusion: Adenocarcinomas of the distal oesophagus and gastric cardia should be regarded as one clinical entity. Uniform staging criteria for both malignancies are recommended.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hulscher, J. B. F., van Sandick, J. W., de Boer, A. G. E. M., Wijnhoven, B. P. L., Tijssen, J. G. P., Fockens, P., Stalmeier, P. F. M., ten Kate, F. J. W., van Dekken, H., Obertop, H., et al. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa022343 · Cited by 1,629
Self-citationOverweight, obesity and gastric cancer risk: Results from a meta-analysis of cohort studies
Yang, P., Zhou, Y., Chen, B., Wan, H.-W., Jia, G.-Q., Bai, H.-L., & Wu, X.-T. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2009.04.019 · Cited by 362
Chen, X. (2002) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/23.1.123 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Wijnhoven, B. P. L., Siersema, P. D., Hop, W. C. J., van Dekken, H., & Tilanus, H. W.
- Venue
- Journal of British Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-04-01
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 529-535
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2162753686
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adenocarcinomas of the distal oesophagus and gastric cardia are one clinical entity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01082.x
- The paper
- Wijnhoven, B. P. L., Siersema, P. D., Hop, W. C. J., van Dekken, H., & Tilanus, H. W. (1999). Adenocarcinomas of the distal oesophagus and gastric cardia are one clinical entity. Journal of British Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01082.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.