The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extended Transthoracic Resection Compared with Limited Transhiatal Resection for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Controversy exists about the best surgical treatment for esophageal carcinoma. METHODS: We randomly assigned 220 patients with adenocarcinoma of the mid-to-distal esophagus or adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia involving the distal esophagus either to transhiatal esophagectomy or to transthoracic esophagectomy with extended en bloc lymphadenectomy. Principal end points were overall survival and disease-free survival. Early morbidity and mortality, the number of quality-adjusted life-years gained, and cost effectiveness were also determined. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients were assigned to undergo transhiatal esophagectomy, and 114 to undergo transthoracic esophagectomy. Demographic characteristics and characteristics of the tumor were similar in the two groups. Perioperative morbidity was higher after transthoracic esophagectomy, but there was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (P=0.45). After a median follow-up of 4.7 years, 142 patients had died--74 (70 percent) after transhiatal resection and 68 (60 percent) after transthoracic resection (P=0.12). Although the difference in survival was not statistically significant, there was a trend toward a survival benefit with the extended approach at five years: disease-free survival was 27 percent in the transhiatal-esophagectomy group, as compared with 39 percent in the transthoracic-esophagectomy group (95 percent confidence interval for the difference, -1 to 24 percent [the negative value indicates better survival with transhiatal resection]), whereas overall survival was 29 percent as compared with 39 percent (95 percent confidence interval for the difference, -3 to 23 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Transhiatal esophagectomy was associated with lower morbidity than transthoracic esophagectomy with extended en bloc lymphadenectomy. Although median overall, disease-free, and quality-adjusted survival did not differ statistically between the groups, there was a trend toward improved long-term survival at five years with the extended transthoracic approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours
(1987) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-82982-6 · Cited by 16,049
Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine
(1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195108248.001.0001 · Cited by 7,193
TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors
Carter, D. (1998) · The American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/00000478-199810000-00016 · Cited by 6,330
Surgical therapy of oesophageal carcinoma
Müller, J. M., Erasmi, H., Stelzner, M., Zieren, U., & Pichlmaier, H. (1990) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800770804 · Cited by 869
Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis
Hulscher, J. B. F., Tijssen, J. G. P., Obertop, H., & van Lanschot, J. J. B. (2001) · The Annals of Thoracic Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02570-4 · Cited by 583
Self-citationAdenocarcinomas of the distal oesophagus and gastric cardia are one clinical entity
Wijnhoven, B. P. L., Siersema, P. D., Hop, W. C. J., van Dekken, H., & Tilanus, H. W. (1999) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01082.x · Cited by 182
Self-citationJansen, S. J. T., Stiggelbout, A. M., Wakker, P. P., Nooij, M. A., Noordijk, E. M., & Kievit, J. (2000) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x0002000108 · Cited by 87
Cited by
Pennathur, A., Gibson, M. K., Jobe, B. A., & Luketich, J. D. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60643-6 · Cited by 2,390
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Outcomes in 222 Patients
Luketich, J. D., Alvelo-Rivera, M., Buenaventura, P. O., Christie, N. A., McCaughan, J. S., Litle, V. R., Schauer, P. R., Close, J. M., & Fernando, H. C. (2003) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000089858.40725.68 · Cited by 893
Ohigashi, Y., Sho, M., Yamada, Y., Tsurui, Y., Hamada, K., Ikeda, N., Mizuno, T., Yoriki, R., Kashizuka, H., Yane, K., et al. (2005) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-04-1469 · Cited by 796
Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers
Ajani, J. A., Barthel, J. S., Bentrem, D. J., D'Amico, T. A., Das, P., Denlinger, C. S., Fuchs, C. S., Gerdes, H., Glasgow, R. E., Hayman, J. A., et al. (2011) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2011.0072 · Cited by 331
The role of surgery in the management of oesophageal cancer
Wu, P. C., & Posner, M. C. (2003) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(03)01167-7 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Hulscher, J. B. F., van Sandick, J. W., de Boer, A. G. E. M., Wijnhoven, B. P. L., Tijssen, J. G. P., Fockens, P., Stalmeier, P. F. M., ten Kate, F. J. W., van Dekken, H., Obertop, H., Tilanus, H. W., & van Lanschot, J. J. B.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2002-11-21
- Volume
- 347
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 1662-1669
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2113217158
- Cited by
- 1,629
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 47.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extended Transthoracic Resection Compared with Limited Transhiatal Resection for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa022343
- The paper
- Hulscher, J. B. F., van Sandick, J. W., de Boer, A. G. E. M., Wijnhoven, B. P. L., Tijssen, J. G. P., Fockens, P., Stalmeier, P. F. M., ten Kate, F. J. W., van Dekken, H., Obertop, H., Tilanus, H. W., & van Lanschot, J. J. B. (2002). Extended Transthoracic Resection Compared with Limited Transhiatal Resection for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa022343
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.