The DOI matches its Crossref record.
During liver regeneration following right portal embolization the growth rate of liver metastases is more rapid than that of the liver parenchyma
Open accessAbstract
Background: The relative growth rates of human liver metastases are not known. The aim of this study was to determine in humans the growth rate of liver parenchyma during regeneration and the growth rate of liver metastases during the same process. Methods: Among 556 patients hepatectomized for a malignant lesion, 48 underwent preoperative selective right portal vein embolization to induce hypertrophy of the left lobe. Five cases were selected because a liver metastasis was present inside the regenerating left lobe. The volumes of the liver metastasis and left lobe were measured with a three-dimensional technique on pre-embolization and postembolization computed tomography (CT) or CT arterial portography. The median interval between the two measurements was 34 (range 28–40) days. Results: An increase occurred in the volume of the liver metastasis and the left lobe in the four patients with functionally intact liver parenchyma, but not in the patient with an impaired parenchyma. The volumetric increase of the normal liver varied from 59 to 127 per cent, compared with 60 to 970 per cent for the liver metastases. The ratio between the growth rate of the left lobe and the liver metastasis varied from 1·0 to 15·6. The growth rates of two metastases in the left lobe of a single patient were different. Conclusion: In functionally intact liver parenchyma, during hepatic regeneration or hypertrophy, the growth rate of metastases is more rapid that that of the liver parenchyma. However, a wide variation in growth rate is observed between patients and between metastases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Portal Vein Embolization Before Right Hepatectomy: Prospective Clinical Trial
Farges, O., Belghiti, J., Kianmanesh, R., Marc Regimbeau, J., Santoro, R., Vilgrain, V., Denys, A., & Sauvanet, A. (2003) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000048447.16651.7b · Cited by 676
Portal vein embolization: rationale, technique and future prospects
Abdalla, E. K., Hicks, M. E., & Vauthey, J. N. (2001) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01658.x · Cited by 425
Kokudo, N., Tada, K., Seki, M., Ohta, H., Azekura, K., Ueno, M., Ohta, K., Yamaguchi, T., Matsubara, T., Takahashi, T., et al. (2001) · Hepatology · doi:10.1053/jhep.2001.26513 · Cited by 339
Current status of surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases
Xu, F., Tang, B., Jin, T.-Q., & Dai, C.-L. (2018) · World Journal of Clinical Cases · doi:10.12998/wjcc.v6.i14.716 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Elias, D., de Baere, T., Roche, A., Ducreux, M., Leclere, J., & Lasser, P.
- Venue
- Journal of British Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-06-01
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 784-788
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2039520219
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: During liver regeneration following right portal embolization the growth rate of liver metastases is more rapid than that of the liver parenchyma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01154.x
- The paper
- Elias, D., de Baere, T., Roche, A., Ducreux, M., Leclere, J., & Lasser, P. (1999). During liver regeneration following right portal embolization the growth rate of liver metastases is more rapid than that of the liver parenchyma. Journal of British Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01154.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.