The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Outcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
Abstract
Background: Few studies have evaluated the long-term functional outcome after anastomotic leakage in the treatment of rectal cancer. Methods: Between 1993 and 1998, 147 patients were admitted with resectable rectal carcinoma, and 92 underwent low anterior resection (LAR). Seventeen patients (18 per cent) developed clinical anastomotic leakage. The functional outcome of 11 of 12 patients, in whom the stoma was subsequently closed and bowel continuity was restored without stricture, was compared with that of 11 matched patients who had undergone LAR without leakage. Anorectal manovolumetry and symptom scoring on visual analogue scales were done 12–48 months after stoma closure. Results: Nine patients made an uneventful recovery after the initial treatment of anastomotic leakage. Eight developed serious septic complications, four of whom had a pelvic abscess, but there was no death. Five patients had chronic complications that precluded closure of the stoma. Patients who had experienced leakage showed reduced neorectal capacity (120 versus 180 ml; P = 0·04), more evacuation problems (P = 0·02), and a trend towards more faecal urgency (P = 0·09) and incontinence (P = 0·06) than control patients. Conclusion: Stoma closure was not possible in five of 17 patients who had experienced anastomotic leakage. Patients who had the stoma closed had impaired long-term anorectal function compared with control patients without leakage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bryant, C. L., Lunniss, P. J., Knowles, C. H., Thaha, M. A., & Chan, C. L. (2012) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70236-x · Cited by 640
Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer
Tan, W. S., Tang, C. L., Shi, L., & Eu, K. W. (2009) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.6594 · Cited by 478
Bregendahl, S., Emmertsen, K. J., Lous, J., & Laurberg, S. (2013) · Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1111/codi.12244 · Cited by 332
The Burden of Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Leaks: an Evaluation of Clinical and Economic Outcomes
Hammond, J., Lim, S., Wan, Y., Gao, X., & Patkar, A. (2014) · Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11605-014-2506-4 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Nesbakken, A., Nygaard, K., & Lunde, O. C.
- Venue
- Journal of British Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-03-01
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 400-404
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2051116769
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01719.x
- The paper
- Nesbakken, A., Nygaard, K., & Lunde, O. C. (2001). Outcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Journal of British Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01719.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.