The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why do parents decide against immunization? The effect of health beliefs and health professionals
Abstract
Objectives To explore the knowledge, attitudes and concerns with respect to immunization and vaccine‐preventable infections in parents whose children have not completed the recommended course of immunization. Setting Parents of children resident in the London Borough of Hackney. Methods Children born between 1 January 1999 and 15 February 1999 were identified from the child health database, and cases were defined as those who had defaulted for one or more primary immunization by 18 months of age. After validation of immunization status from health records, questionnaires were sent to parents. Ten respondents from this sample were interviewed. Results Questionnaires were sent to 129 parents of children identified as not completing the recommended immunization course. Nine questionnaires were returned ‘address unknown’, and 76 parents returned the completed questionnaire. The response rate from known residents was 76/110 (69%). Eight parents stated that their child had been immunized, leaving 68 questionnaires available for further analysis. Measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) and meningococcal C were most frequently omitted, usually because of concerns about vaccine safety. Twenty‐three out of 68 respondents perceived that having their child immunized with a particular vaccine was more risky than non‐immunization, particularly for MMR and meningococcal C vaccines. Those who agreed to be interviewed were notably concerned about the MMR vaccine, but not immunization in general. They perceived the information provided by health professionals to be poor. Conclusions The decision‐making process around childhood immunization is complex. Parents require information that is up to date, tailored to their individual needs and provided by health professionals who are well informed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Choosing not to immunize: are parents making informed decisions?
Sporton, R. K., & Francis, S.-A. (2001) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/18.2.181 · Cited by 101
Cited by
Brown, K. F., Kroll, J. S., Hudson, M. J., Ramsay, M., Green, J., Long, S. J., Vincent, C. A., Fraser, G., & Sevdalis, N. (2010) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.04.052 · Cited by 412
Voo, J. Y. H., Lean, Q. Y., Ming, L. C., Md. Hanafiah, N. H., Al-Worafi, Y. M., & Ibrahim, B. (2021) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines9111348 · Cited by 380
Parents’ vaccination comprehension and decisions
Downs, J. S., de Bruin, W. B., & Fischhoff, B. (2008) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.01.011 · Cited by 245
(2006) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 224
Andersson, N., Cockcroft, A., Ansari, N. M., Omer, K., Baloch, M., Ho Foster, A., Shea, B., Wells, G. A., & Soberanis, J. L. (2009) · BMC International Health and Human Rights · doi:10.1186/1472-698x-9-s1-s8 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Smailbegovic, M. S., Laing, G. J., & Bedford, H.
- Venue
- Child: Care, Health and Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-06-19
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 303-311
- ISSN
- 0305-1862 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2214
- OpenAlex
- W2170895477
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why do parents decide against immunization? The effect of health beliefs and health professionals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2214.2003.00347.x
- The paper
- Smailbegovic, M. S., Laing, G. J., & Bedford, H. (2003). Why do parents decide against immunization? The effect of health beliefs and health professionals. Child: Care, Health and Development. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2214.2003.00347.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.