Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 260

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Outcome of double‐blind, placebo‐controlled food challenge tests in 107 children with atopic dermatitis

NIGGEMANN, SIELAFF, BEYER, BINDER, WAHN·1999·Clinical & Experimental Allergy

Abstract

Background and objective: Little is known about late phase clinical reactions during oral food challenges and the value of specific IgE in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Methods: We therefore analysed retrospectively the clinical outcome of 387 oral provocations during double‐blind, placebo‐controlled food challenge tests in 107 children with atopic dermatitis. Results: Eighty‐seven (81%) children showed a positive clinical reaction to at least one challenge. The vast majority of children (94%) showed clinical symptoms to one or two allergens. One hundred and thirty‐one of 259 (51%) of verum challenges and 1/128 (0.8%) placebo challenge were assessed as positive. Oral provocations with hen's egg showed the highest percentage of positive reactions (70%). Sensitivity of specific IgE to the four allergens tested was 90%, specificity 30%. Sensitivity of the parental history as a predictive factor was 48%, specificity 72%. Ninety‐two of 131 (70%) children with positive verum provocations showed early reactions, 33 (25%) late and six (5%) combined early and late reactions. In 84/131 (64%) positive provocations one organ system was involved, while in 44 (34%) provocations two and in three (2%) challenges three organ systems were involved. Skin reactions were the most frequent clinical manifestation leading to positive reactions followed by gastro‐intestinal and respiratory symptoms. There was no correlation between titration dose and specific IgE. The subgroup of non‐sensitized children did not differ in terms of sex, age or titration dose from the total study population. Conclusion: Double‐blind, placebo‐controlled oral food challenges are helpful in distinguishing children with clinically manifested symptoms from those with food sensitization. Accurately identifying children with a clinical relevant food allergy may help to prescribe specific diets on a scientific basis, avoiding dietary limitations which may be unneccessary or even harmful.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2222.1999.00454.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 260

Metadata

Authors
NIGGEMANN, SIELAFF, BEYER, BINDER, & WAHN
Venue
Clinical & Experimental Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
91-96
ISSN
  • 0954-7894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2222
OpenAlex
W1510156095
Cited by
260
References
1
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcome of double‐blind, placebo‐controlled food challenge tests in 107 children with atopic dermatitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2222.1999.00454.x
The paper
NIGGEMANN, SIELAFF, BEYER, BINDER, & WAHN. (1999). Outcome of double‐blind, placebo‐controlled food challenge tests in 107 children with atopic dermatitis. Clinical & Experimental Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2222.1999.00454.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.