Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 197

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Epithelial damage and response

Holgate·2000·Clinical & Experimental Allergy

Abstract

Epithelial damage is a characteristic feature of asthma. The epithelium is not merely a passive barrier but can generate a range of mediators that may play a role in the inflammatory and remodelling responses that occur in the lungs in asthma. For example, the cytokine granulocyte macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF), whose principal source is the epithelium, can prolong eosinophil survival while transforming growth factor is a potent profibrogenic cytokine. Deposition of collagen in the epithelial subbasement membrane is a characteristic feature of the remodelling response in asthma. This may be due to abnormal associations between myofibroblasts and epithelium, both of which are involved in early lung development (epithelial–mesenchymal trophic unit). In asthma, there may be a primary defect in the epithelium such that it responds abnormally to various stimuli and cannot undergo the normal repair response. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) appears to be a key factor in bronchial epithelial repair; it stimulates epithelial cell proliferation and migration. The 3v isoform of the adhesion molecule CD44 is overexpressed in damaged epithelium and seems to regulate the repair response by presenting EGF more efficiently to its receptor. Although EGF receptor expression is increased in asthma, it does not lead to an appropriate proliferative response and restitution of normal epithelium. Other factors such as transforming growth factor (TGF)β which are generated by inflammatory cells and epithelium are also upregulated in asthma. An epithelial/fibroblast co‐culture system has shown that following epithelial damage various growth factors are released from the underlying myofibroblasts and are responsible for the proliferative response. The TGFβ family are most likely responsible for collagen production. In an in vitro study, an EGF receptor inhibitor slowed epithelial repair but enhanced TGFβ production by the slowly repairing epithelial cells. In conclusion, the interaction between epithelial cells and myofibroblasts, i.e. reactivation of the epithelial–mesenchymal trophic unit appears to be central to the airway wall remodelling response.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2000.00095.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 197

Metadata

Authors
Holgate
Venue
Clinical & Experimental Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-06
Volume
30
Issue
s1
Pages
37-41
ISSN
  • 0954-7894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2222
OpenAlex
W2036614649
Cited by
197
References
0
FWCI
6.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epithelial damage and response. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2222.2000.00095.x
The paper
Holgate. (2000). Epithelial damage and response. Clinical & Experimental Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2222.2000.00095.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.