Cited by 135Allergic Rhinitis and SensitizationAsthma and respiratory diseasesSinusitis and nasal conditions

Evidence for an inflammatory pathophysiology in idiopathic rhinitis

Open access
Powe, D. G., Huskisson, R. S., Carney, A. S., Jenkins, D., Jones, N. S.·2001·Clinical & Experimental Allergy

Abstract

Background The pathophysiology of idiopathic rhinitis is unknown but the disease is classified as being non‐allergic on the basis of negative serum IgE radioallergosorbent assay (RAST) and skin prick tests. In contrast, allergic rhinitis has a Th2 type inflammatory pathology mediated by IgE and mast cells. Objective To test the null hypothesis that there would be no difference in the cellular infiltrate for key Th2‐associated inflammatory cells between allergic and idiopathic rhinitis. Methods We applied strict selection criteria in the recruitment of allergic and idiopathic rhinitis cases. In contrast to previous studies which used cytology or small biopsies, we studied all layers of the mucosa by using whole, full‐thickness nasal turbinate specimens with an average length of 2.5 cm. Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization techniques were used to compare the distribution and cell populations of mast cells, IgE positive (IgE + ) cells, eosinophils and plasma cells in perennial allergic ( n = 11) and idiopathic ( n = 17) rhinitis, and control nasal mucosal tissue ( n = 9). Results Mast cells and IgE + cells were significantly increased within the epithelium of allergic and idiopathic mucosa compared to normal mucosa ( P < 0.05). More IgE + cells were present in the allergic group compared to the idiopathic group with the majority of IgE + cells being mast cells. Both rhinitic groups showed increased eosinophilia localized to the superficial submucosa compared to normal mucosa ( P < 0.05). More plasma cells were present in the allergic rhinitic tissue. Conclusion Idiopathic and allergic rhinitic mucosa show similarities in their inflammatory infiltrate suggesting that both groups share a highly localized Th2, IgE‐mediated cellular immunopathology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2001.01106.x

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nasal biopsies from NARES patients commonly show increased numbers of mast cells and prominent mast cell degranulation.

    “In addition, nasal biopsies from these patients commonly show increased numbers of mast cells and prominent mast cell degranulation.177,178”

    From International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (2018) · cites this paper as [177]

    The Mast cells results and Mast cells and IgE+ cells discussion report increased epithelial mast cells in idiopathic rhinitis compared with controls, with most of those cells degranulated. However, the paper studied patients selected for idiopathic rhinitis, not specifically NARES; its Eosinophils discussion says not all idiopathic cases had increased eosinophils. The findings therefore support the mast-cell observations but not their attribution specifically to NARES patients. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Immunologic studies have revealed a Th2 inflammatory response in the nasal mucosa of LAR patients, with positive response to NPT and local production of sIgE and inflammatory mediators.

    “Immunologic studies have revealed the existence of a Th2 inflammatory response in the nasal mucosa of LAR patients,177,299-301 with positive response to NPT,291,300-302 and local production of sIgE177,290,299-301,303-305 and inflammatory mediators.304,306,307”

    From International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (2018) · cites this paper as [177]

    The Results and Discussion (pages unavailable) report increased IgE-positive cells, mast cells, and eosinophils in idiopathic rhinitis and suggest a localized Th2-type response. The study did not establish that these patients had LAR through a positive nasal provocation test, nor did it demonstrate local production of allergen-specific IgE; its Th2 conclusion is also more tentative than the citing sentence suggests. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Ying S, Durham SR, Jacobson MR et al. T lymphocytes and mast cells express messenger RNA for interleukin-4 in the nasal mucosa in allergen-induced rhinitis. Immunol 1994; 93:281±8.
  2. Varney VA, Jacobson MR, Sudderick RM et al. Immunohis- tology of the nasal mucosa following allergen-induced rhinitis. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991; 146:170±6.
  3. Igarashi Y, Goldrich MS, Kaliner MA, Irani A-MA, Schwartz LB, White MV. Allergens, IgE, mediators, inflammatory mechanisms. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1995; 95:716±25.
  4. Cameron L, Durham S, Wright E et al. Evidence for local IgE RNA transcript synthesis in allergic nasal mucosa following in vitro antigen challenge. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1998; 101 (1):S162.
  5. Carney AS, Jones NS. Nasal challenge in patients with idiopathic rhinitis: evidence for `localised allergy'? Allergo- logie 1998; 21:581.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Powe, D. G., Huskisson, R. S., Carney, A. S., Jenkins, D., & Jones, N. S.
Affiliations
Queen's Medical Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Powe, D. G.
Venue
Clinical & Experimental Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-06
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
864-872
ISSN
  • 0954-7894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2222
OpenAlex
W1977005065
Cited by
135
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical & Experimental Allergy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
Keywords
vasomotor rhinitis, allergic rhinitis, type 2 inflammation, IgE, mast cells, eosinophils, plasma cells, nasal mucosa, nasal turbinates, non-allergic rhinitis, inflammatory cell infiltration
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Eosinophils, Epithelial Cells, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulin E, Immunohistochemistry, Leukocyte Count, Male, Mast Cells, Middle Aged, Nasal Mucosa, Plasma Cells, Rhinitis, Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial, Staining and Labeling, Cell Degranulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review