Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 508

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ultrasonography‐guided fine‐needle aspiration of thyroid incidentaloma: correlation with pathological findings

Nam‐Goong, Il Seong, Kim, Ha Young, Gong, Gyungyub, Lee, Ho Kyu, Hong, Suck Joon, Kim, Won Bae, Shong, Young Kee·2004·Clinical Endocrinology

Abstract

background There are many reports that diagnostic accuracy of fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid is improved with ultrasound guidance, especially for impalpable nodules. Despite its general acceptance, routine use of ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration (USGFNA) has been the source of much controversy due to the lack of large‐scale studies and lack of data on the natural course of well‐differentiated thyroid cancer of small size. objective The aim of our study was to define the rate of malignancy in relatively large numbers of patients with incidentally detected impalpable thyroid nodules and to assess the extent of disease in patients with suspicious or malignant cytology on USGFNA of thyroid nodules by surgery. patients We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of the 267 patients who underwent USGFNA of incidental thyroid nodules from January 2000 to December 2001. results Three hundred and seventeen nodules from 267 patients were aspirated. The average size of nodules was 0·9 ± 0·3 cm, a range of 0·2 cm to 1·5 cm. All 317 lesions were impalpable. Cytological diagnosis included 101 inadequate specimen (32%), 139 benign (44%), 29 indeterminate (9%), four suspicious of follicular or Hürthle cell neoplasm (1%), 42 papillary carcinoma (13%) and two others. The size of the nodule was not related to the probability of getting an adequate specimen for cytological diagnosis. Forty of 48 patients with suspicious or malignant cytology underwent surgery. All 35 patients with a cytological diagnosis of papillary carcinoma were confirmed to have papillary carcinoma on histological results. One of three patients with a cytological diagnosis of follicular neoplasm had a follicular carcinoma. In 36 patients with well‐differentiated thyroid cancer, extrathyroidal extension was observed in 44% (16/36), regional lymph node metastasis was found in 50% (18/36) and multifocal tumours were found in 39% (14/36). conclusions The rate of malignancy in incidentally detected impalpable thyroid nodules was 12% in retrospective analysis of our patients. In this subgroup, 69% (25/36) of patients had either extrathyroidal extension or regional node involvement and 39% had multifocal tumours at surgery. This suggests that the small size alone does not guarantee low risk in incidentally found thyroid cancers. USGFNA is a useful diagnostic method in these patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2003.01912.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 508

Metadata

Authors
Nam‐Goong, I. S., Kim, H. Y., Gong, G., Lee, H. K., Hong, S. J., Kim, W. B., & Shong, Y. K.
Venue
Clinical Endocrinology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-11-24
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
21-28
ISSN
  • 0300-0664 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2265
OpenAlex
W2024455728
Cited by
508
References
0
FWCI
8.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrasonography‐guided fine‐needle aspiration of thyroid incidentaloma: correlation with pathological findings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2265.2003.01912.x
The paper
Nam‐Goong, I. S., Kim, H. Y., Gong, G., Lee, H. K., Hong, S. J., Kim, W. B., & Shong, Y. K. (2004). Ultrasonography‐guided fine‐needle aspiration of thyroid incidentaloma: correlation with pathological findings. Clinical Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2265.2003.01912.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.