The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long‐term use of smokeless tobacco and physical performance in middle‐aged men
Abstract
To determine the influence of prolonged nicotine exposure on maximal physical working capacity, a study of clinical measures of physical fitness and cardiovascular response to exercise was performed in 144 healthy men, 35–60 years old, subdivided into smokeless tobacco users, smokers and non‐users of tobacco. Regular users of smokeless tobacco, with exposures of more than 20 years, showed similar maximal oxygen uptake (mean 3.48 L min−1, SD 0.49, n = 48) to non‐users (mean 3.51 L min−1, SD 0.51, n = 65). In smokeless tobacco users, higher blood pressure and heart rate values were observed at rest and at submaximal work, after exposure to tobacco shortly before the exercise test, but not at maximal work. However, significantly lower maximal oxygen uptake was found for smokers (mean 2.88 L min−1, SD 0.49, n = 31) compared with non‐users (P < 0.001). Plasma concentration of cotinine, the main metabolite of nicotine, was significantly higher in smokeless tobacco users (mean 347 ng mL−1, SD 175, n = 48) than in smokers (mean 253 ng mL−1, SD 153, n = 31, P < 0.001). The findings indicate that long‐term use of smokeless tobacco does not significantly influence exercise capacity in healthy, physically well‐trained subjects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“They found no difference in V ˙O2 max between these subjects and non-tobacco users, but did find a significant reduction in smokers.”
From Effects of Habitual Smoking on Cardiorespiratory Responses to Sub-maximal Exercise (2004) · cites this paper as Bolinder et al. (1997)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effect of smokeless tobacco (snus) on smoking and public health in Sweden
Foulds, J., Ramstrom, L., Burke, M., & Fagerström, K. (2003) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc.12.4.349 · Cited by 471
Effects of Habitual Smoking on Cardiorespiratory Responses to Sub-maximal Exercise
Kobayashi, Y., Takeuchi, T., Hosoi, T., & Loeppky, J. A. (2004) · Journal of PHYSIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY and Applied Human Science · doi:10.2114/jpa.23.163 · Cited by 72
Considerations related to vaping as a possible gateway into cigarette smoking: An analytical review
Lee, P. N., Coombs, K. J., & Afolalu, E. F. (2018) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.16928.1 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- BOLINDER, G., NORÉN, A., WAHREN, J., & DE FAIRE, U.
- Venue
- European Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 427-433
- ISSN
- 0014-2972
- 1365-2362
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.