Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 377

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Catchment and reach‐scale properties as indicators of macroinvertebrate species traits

RICHARDS, CARL, HARO, ROGER, JOHNSON, LUCINDA, HOST, GEORGE·1997·Freshwater Biology

Abstract

1. We used catchment and reach‐scale physical properties to predict the occurrence of specific species life history and behaviour traits of aquatic insects across fifty‐eight catchments in a mixed land use basin. Catchment‐scale attributes were derived using a geographical information system (GIS). Logistic regression techniques were used to model the relationships. 2. The reach‐scale properties were highly predictive of species traits. Fourteen of the fifteen traits had significant models with concordance values greater than 68%. Cross‐sectional area at bank full discharge, % shallow, slow‐water habitats, and % fines were the most important variables. 3. Life history and behavioural attributes were best related to reach‐scale physical features. This suggests that species traits exhibit strong relationships to local environmental conditions. 4. Catchment‐scale variables had fewer significant models with species traits (four of fifteen), however these variables may have direct or indirect influence on reach‐scale properties. 5. Catchment features, in particular surficial geology, influence macroinvertebrate assemblages through their control over channel morphology and hydrologic patterns. 6. The effects of land use were masked by geology (i.e. lacustrine clay geology and rowcrop agriculture were correlated), lack of detail in land use data and the aggregation of the species data. 7. These models reflect the coupling of local environmental conditions and the set of adaptations among the local taxa. These observations underscore the idea that habitat plays a major role in organizing stream assemblages. 8. Using these approaches, predictions can be made about the ability of various taxonomic groupings to track environmental change through time, or for projecting the impact of alternative land management scenarios. Identifying fundamental life history and other traits can improve the selection and evaluation of such indicators.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.d01-540.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 377

Metadata

Authors
RICHARDS, C., HARO, R., JOHNSON, L., & HOST, G.
Venue
Freshwater Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-02
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
219-230
ISSN
  • 0046-5070 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2427
OpenAlex
W1995663318
Cited by
377
References
3
FWCI
15.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Catchment and reach‐scale properties as indicators of macroinvertebrate species traits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.d01-540.x
The paper
RICHARDS, C., HARO, R., JOHNSON, L., & HOST, G. (1997). Catchment and reach‐scale properties as indicators of macroinvertebrate species traits. Freshwater Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.d01-540.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.