Cited by 3,626Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecologyHydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFish Ecology and Management Studies

Landscapes and Riverscapes: The Influence of Land Use on Stream Ecosystems

Allan, J. David·2004·Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics

Abstract

▪ Abstract Local habitat and biological diversity of streams and rivers are strongly influenced by landform and land use within the surrounding valley at multiple scales. However, empirical associations between land use and stream response only varyingly succeed in implicating pathways of influence. This is the case for a number of reasons, including (a) covariation of anthropogenic and natural gradients in the landscape; (b) the existence of multiple, scale-dependent mechanisms; (c) nonlinear responses; and (d) the difficulties of separating present-day from historical influences. Further research is needed that examines responses to land use under different management strategies and that employs response variables that have greater diagnostic value than many of the aggregated measures in current use. In every respect, the valley rules the stream. H.B.N. Hynes (1975)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.120202.110122

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The frequency, duration, timing, and magnitude of river flows altered by restoration and management affect sensitive systems and organisms.

    “The frequency, duration, timing, and magnitude of river flows altered by restoration and management affect sensitive systems and organisms (Allan 2004).”
  • Non-linear indirect effects are to be expected in watersheds and on coasts.

    “Non-linear indirect effects are to be expected in watersheds and on coasts (Allan 2004).”
  • Knowledge of landscape indicators of salmon-habitat condition such as forest cover and impervious surface indicates that potential effects of the wider landscape on restoration outcomes should not be ignored.

    “Knowledge of landscape indicators of salmon-habitat condition such as forest cover and impervious surface suggests that we should not ignore the potential effects of this wider landscape on the outcome of the program (Booth et al. 2002, Allan 2004, Hale et al. 2004, Andrew and Wulder 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allan, J. D.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Allan, J. David
Venue
Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
Published
2004-12-15
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
257-284
ISSN
  • 1543-592X (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2069
OpenAlex
W2125360150
Cited by
3,626
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 188 · 2025: 196 · 2024: 182 · 2023: 170 · 2022: 195 · 2021: 250 · 2020: 189 · 2019: 228 · 2018: 206 · 2017: 209 · 2016: 227 · 2015: 224 · 2014: 208 · 2013: 172 · 2012: 160
FWCI
5.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Keywords
land use, stream ecosystems, river landscape, anthropogenic gradients, scale dependence, nonlinear response, stream habitat, biodiversity, watershed management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review