The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fluvial landscape ecology: addressing uniqueness within the river discontinuum
Abstract
1. As rivers and streams are patchy and strongly hierarchical systems, a hierarchical patch dynamics perspective can be used as a framework for visualising interactions between structure and function in fluvial landscapes. The perspective is useful for addressing fundamental attributes of lotic ecosystems, such as heterogeneity, hierarchy, directionality and process feedback occurring across spatial scales and for illustrating spatio‐temporal linkages between disparate concepts in lotic system ecology such as the River Continuum Concept, the Serial Discontinuity Concept, the Flood Pulse Concept and the Hyporheic Corridor Concept. 2. At coarse spatial scales, the hierarchical patch dynamics perspective describes each river network as a unique, patchy discontinuum from headwaters to mouth. The discontinuum is comprised of a longitudinal series of alternating stream segments with different geomorphological structures. Each confluence in the steam network further punctuates the discontinuum because the sudden change in stream characteristics can create a `gap' in the expected pattern of downstream transitions. The discontinuum view recognises general trends in habitat characteristics along the longitudinal profile, but creates a framework for studying and understanding the ecological importance of each stream's individual pattern of habitat transitions along longitudinal, lateral or vertical vectors at any scale. 3. Object‐oriented modelling and programming techniques provide a means for developing robust, quantitative simulation models that describe the dynamic structure of patch hierarchies. Such models can simulate how the structure and function of lotic ecosystems are influenced by the landscape context of the system (the ecological conditions within which the system is set) and the metastructure (structural characteristics and juxtaposition) of finer‐scale patches comprising the system. 4. A simple object‐oriented, multiscale, discontinuum model of solute transformation and biological response along a stream channel illustrates how changing the branching pattern of a stream and the arrangement of its component patches along the downstream profile will result in substantial changes in predicted patterns of solute concentration and biotic community structure. 5. The importance of context, structure, and metastructure in determining lotic ecosystem function serves to underscore Hynes' (1975) concept that `every stream is likely to be individual.' Advancing the discipline of fluvial landscape ecology provides an excellent opportunity to develop general concepts and tools that address the individual character of each stream network and integrate the concept of `uniqueness within the river discontinuum' into our ecological understanding of rivers and streams.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vannote, R. L., Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J. R., & Cushing, C. E. (1980) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f80-017 · Cited by 9,984
The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems
Junk, W. J. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,530
Landscape Ecology: The Effect Of Pattern On Process
Turner, M. G. (1989) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.20.1.171 · Cited by 3,273
A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: Viewing streams in a watershed context
Frissell, C. A., Liss, W. J., Warren, C. E., & Hurley, M. D. (1986) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/bf01867358 · Cited by 2,333
(1982) · Cited by 2,048
Poff, N. L. (1997) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.2307/1468026 · Cited by 1,833
(2007) · Fundamentals of Fluvial Geomorphology · doi:10.4324/9780203371084-12 · Cited by 1,685
A hierarchical concept of ecosystems
O’Neill, R. V. (1986) · Cited by 1,598
Cross‐Scale Morphology, Geometry, and Dynamics of Ecosystems
Holling, C. S. (1992) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937313 · Cited by 1,472
From Balance of Nature to Hierarchical Patch Dynamics: A Paradigm Shift in Ecology
Wu, J., & Loucks, O. L. (1995) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/419172 · Cited by 1,246
Cited by
Tangled webs: reciprocal flows of invertebrate prey link streams and riparian zones
BAXTER, C. V., FAUSCH, K. D., & CARL SAUNDERS, W. (2005) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01328.x · Cited by 1,204
State of science: mental workload in ergonomics
Young, M. S., Brookhuis, K. A., Wickens, C. D., & Hancock, P. A. (2015) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2014.956151 · Cited by 948
Corenblit, D., Tabacchi, E., Steiger, J., & Gurnell, A. M. (2007) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2007.05.004 · Cited by 721
Kondolf, G. M., Boulton, A. J., O'Daniel, S., Poole, G. C., Rahel, F. J., Stanley, E. H., Wohl, E., Bång, A., Carlstrom, J., Cristoni, C., et al. (2006) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-01747-110205 · Cited by 537
Self-citationHydrological connectivity for riverine fish: measurement challenges and research opportunities
FULLERTON, A. H., BURNETT, K. M., STEEL, E. A., FLITCROFT, R. L., PESS, G. R., FEIST, B. E., TORGERSEN, C. E., MILLER, D. J., & SANDERSON, B. L. (2010) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02448.x · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- POOLE, G. C.
- Venue
- Freshwater Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 641-660
- ISSN
- 0046-5070 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2427
- OpenAlex
- W2104497939
- Cited by
- 607
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 12.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fluvial landscape ecology: addressing uniqueness within the river discontinuum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00922.x
- The paper
- POOLE, G. C. (2002). Fluvial landscape ecology: addressing uniqueness within the river discontinuum. Freshwater Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00922.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.