Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,074

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ecological effects of perturbation by drought in flowing waters

Open access
Lake, P. S.·2003·Freshwater Biology

Abstract

SUMMARY: Knowledge of the ecology of droughts in flowing waters is scattered and fragmentary, with much of the available information being gathered opportunistically. Studies on intermittent and arid‐zone streams have provided most of the information. Drought in streams may be viewed as a disturbance in which water inflow, river flow and water availability fall to extremely low levels for extended periods of time. As an ecological perturbation, there is the disturbance of drought and the responses of the biota to the drought. Droughts can either be periodic, seasonal or supra‐seasonal events. The types of disturbance for seasonal droughts are presses and for supra‐seasonal droughts, ramps. In droughts, hydrological connectivity is disrupted. Such disruption range from flow reduction to complete loss of surface water and connectivity. The longitudinal patterns along streams as to where flow ceases and drying up occurs differs between streams. Three patterns are outlined: ‘downstream drying’, ‘headwater drying’ and ‘mid‐reach drying’. There are both direct and indirect effects of drought on stream ecosystems. Marked direct effects include loss of water, loss of habitat for aquatic organisms and loss of stream connectivity. Indirect effects include the deterioration of water quality, alteration of food resources, and changes in the strength and structure of interspecific interactions. Droughts have marked effects on the densities and size‐ or age‐structure of populations, on community composition and diversity, and on ecosystem processes. Organisms can resist the effects of drought by the use of refugia. Survival in refugia may strongly influence the capacity of the biota to recover from droughts once they break. Recovery by biota varies markedly between seasonal and supra‐seasonal droughts. Faunal recovery from seasonal droughts follows predictable sequences, whilst recovery from supra‐seasonal droughts varies from one case to another and may be marked by dense populations of transient species and the depletion of biota that normally occur in the streams. The restoration of streams must include the provision of drought refugia and the inclusion of drought in the long‐term flow regime.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01086.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,074

Metadata

Authors
Lake, P. S.
Venue
Freshwater Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-06-18
Volume
48
Issue
7
Pages
1161-1172
ISSN
  • 0046-5070 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2427
OpenAlex
W2155750683
Cited by
1,074
References
1
FWCI
24.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecological effects of perturbation by drought in flowing waters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01086.x
The paper
Lake, P. S. (2003). Ecological effects of perturbation by drought in flowing waters. Freshwater Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01086.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.