The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of refugia for fishes during drought: a review and synthesis
Abstract
Summary: Drought is a natural disturbance of aquatic ecosystems and can be a major factor in structuring aquatic communities. For individuals, populations and communities to persist in disturbed environments, they must have refuge from disturbance or disturbance must be minimal. Refugia convey spatial and temporal resistance or resilience in the face of disturbance, but the role of refugia in aquatic systems remains poorly understood. 2. We review available literature on aquatic refugia for fishes in order to synthesise current knowledge and provide suggestions for needed research. Our objectives were to clarify definitions of disturbance and refugia in the context of drought in aquatic systems, review how refuge habitats influence fish community structure, and consider the potential impact of refugia on fish population and community dynamics during drought. 3. Droughts cause a decrease in surface area/volume and an increase in extremes of physical and chemical water quality parameters. These conditions are linked with biotic interactions that structure the community of fishes residing in low‐flow or dry season refugia by increasing mortality rates, decreasing birth rates and/or increasing migration rates. Many aquatic organisms seek refuge from disturbance and/or have adaptations (e.g. physiological tolerance) that provide refuge. 4. Drought in aquatic systems leads to shifts in refugia spacing and connectance at multiple spatial and temporal scales. Refuge size, disturbance intensity, and mobility of organisms is predicted to play a large role in population persistence. We expect that refuge habitats will experience net immigration during drying and net emigration after rewetting, with the opposite occurring in surrounding habitat patches. Population dynamics of fishes using refugia during drought are best modelled by modified source‐sink dynamics, but dynamics are likely to change with spatial scale.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sources, Sinks, and Population Regulation
Pulliam, H. R. (1988) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284880 · Cited by 5,367
The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics.
Proctor, J., Pickett, S. T. A., & White, P. S. (1986) · The Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2403105 · Cited by 3,949
Some Demographic and Genetic Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity for Biological Control
Levins, R. (1969) · Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America · doi:10.1093/besa/15.3.237 · Cited by 3,474
Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure
Taylor, P. D., Fahrig, L., Henein, K., & Merriam, G. (1993) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3544927 · Cited by 2,568
The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics
(1985) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-02952-3 · Cited by 2,121
Wootton, R. J. (1989) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-0829-1 · Cited by 2,063
Landscapes to Riverscapes: Bridging the Gap between Research and Conservation of Stream Fishes
FAUSCH, K. D., TORGERSEN, C. E., BAXTER, C. V., & LI, H. W. (2002) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0483:ltrbtg]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,600
The Role of Disturbance in Stream Ecology
Resh, V. H., Brown, A. V., Covich, A. P., Gurtz, M. E., Li, H. W., Minshall, G. W., Reice, S. R., Sheldon, A. L., Wallace, J. B., & Wissmar, R. C. (1988) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.2307/1467300 · Cited by 1,586
Ecological Studies in Tropical Fish Communities
Lowe-McConnell, R. H. (1987) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511721892 · Cited by 1,560
Patterns in Freshwater Fish Ecology
Matthews, W. J. (1998) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4066-3 · Cited by 1,301
Cited by
A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation
Lindenmayer, D., Hobbs, R. J., Montague‐Drake, R., Alexandra, J., Bennett, A., Burgman, M., Cale, P., Calhoun, A., Cramer, V., Cullen, P., et al. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01114.x · Cited by 746
Climate change poised to threaten hydrologic connectivity and endemic fishes in dryland streams
Jaeger, K. L., Olden, J. D., & Pelland, N. A. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1320890111 · Cited by 403
Patch dynamics and environmental heterogeneity in lotic ecosystems
Winemiller, K. O., Flecker, A. S., & Hoeinghaus, D. J. (2010) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.1899/08-048.1 · Cited by 266
Implications of climate change for the fishes of the British Isles
Graham, C. T., & Harrod, C. (2009) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02180.x · Cited by 247
Davis, J., Pavlova, A., Thompson, R., & Sunnucks, P. (2013) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12203 · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Magoulick, D. D., & Kobza, R. M.
- Venue
- Freshwater Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-06-18
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1186-1198
- ISSN
- 0046-5070 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2427
- OpenAlex
- W2074031809
- Cited by
- 600
- References
- 73
- FWCI
- 8.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of refugia for fishes during drought: a review and synthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01089.x
- The paper
- Magoulick, D. D., & Kobza, R. M. (2003). The role of refugia for fishes during drought: a review and synthesis. Freshwater Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01089.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.