Cited by 266Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecologyEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes

Patch dynamics and environmental heterogeneity in lotic ecosystems

Open access
Winemiller, Kirk O., Flecker, Alexander S., Hoeinghaus, David J.·2010·Journal of the North American Benthological Society

Abstract

We reviewed concepts of patch dynamics and environmental heterogeneity and their applications to the study of fluvial ecosystems, with emphasis on research published in J-NABS. We discuss several important papers synthesizing theories and findings on this topic and reports of descriptive and experimental research. A large body of research, much of it published in J-NABS, has demonstrated how spatial and temporal variation influences population, community, and ecosystem patterns and processes in fluvial ecosystems. Conceptual models of patch dynamics can be traced to 2 basic approaches: 1) the landscape ecology perspective and 2) the metacommunity perspective. The former focuses on how spatial patterns are created and affect ecological processes over variable scales of space and time, whereas the latter emphasizes the important influence of periodic disturbances, refugia, and dispersal in maintaining nonequilibrium communities within patch mosaics. The origin of the metacommunity Patch Dynamics Concept can be traced to G. Evelyn Hutchinson’s ideas about nonequilibrium communities, and a key contribution was Townsend’s (19894) J-NABS review of the Patch Dynamics Concept in stream community ecology. The study of fluvial ecosystem ecology from a patch-dynamics landscape perspective is well represented by empirical studies published in J-NABS, but some emerging topics remain little studied, including: 1) experiments designed to test predictions of the Patch Dynamics Concept of metacommunities vs alternative models; 2) empirical documentation of patch dynamics and their effects on ecological processes across longitudinal, lateral, and temporal gradients; 3) the influence of species’ life-history attributes on community dynamics in relation to habitat characteristics and aspects of disturbance; and 4) the manner in which landscape patterns, patch dynamics, and metacommunity dynamics affect foodweb patterns and processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1899/08-048.1

Cites

180 of 180 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prey communities are exceedingly patchy, and this is the case for dipterans in the LCRE.

    “Prey communities are known to be exceedingly patchy (Winemiller et al. 2010), and this certainly is the case for dipterans in the LCRE (K.MacNeale, NOAA Fisheries, personal communication).”

    From Evidence‐based evaluation of the cumulative effects of ecosystem restoration (2016) · cites this paper as Winemiller et al. 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 185 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. ARRINGTON, D. A., AND K. O. WINEMILLER. 2006. Cyclical flood pulses, littoral habitats and species associations in a Neotropical floodplain river. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 25:126-141.
  2. CHESSON, P. L. 1986. Environmental variation and the coexistence of species. Pages 240-256 in J. M. Diamond and T. J. Case (editors). Community ecology. Harper and Row, New York.
  3. ELTON, C. 1927. Animal ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
  4. HILDREW, A. G., AND P. S. GILLER. 1994. Patchiness, species interactions and disturbance in stream benthos. Pages 21-61 in P. S. Giller, A. G. Hildrew, and D. G. Rafaelli (editors). Aquatic ecology: scale, pattern and process. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, UK.
  5. KILBANE, G. M., AND J. R. HOLOMUZKI. 2004. Spatial attributes, scale, and species traits determine caddisfly distributional responses to flooding. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23:480-493.
  6. KOBAYASHI, S., AND T. KAGAYA. 2004. Litter patch types determine macroinvertebrate assemblages in pools of a Japanese head- water stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23:78-89.
  7. KOLASA, J., AND T. A. PICKETT (EDITORS). 1991. Ecological heterogene- ity. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  8. LAMOUROUX, N., S. DOLE ´DEC, AND S. GAYRAUD. 2004. Biological traits of stream macroinvertebrate communities: effects of microhabitat, reach, and basin filters. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23:449-466.
  9. POWER, M. E., W. E. RAINEY, M. S. PARKER, J. L. SABO, A. SMYTH, S. KHANDWALA, J. C. FINLAY, F. C. MCNEELY, K. MARSEE, AND C. 2010] PATCH DYNAMICS IN STREAMS ANDERSON. 2004. River-to-watershed subsidies in an old-growth conifer forest. Pages 217-240 in G. A. Polis, M. E. Power, and G. R. Huxel (editors). Food webs at the landscape level. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
  10. RILEY, R. H., C. R. TOWNSEND, D. A. RAFFAELLI, AND A. S. FLECKER. 2004. Sources and effects of subsidies along the stream-estuary continuum. Pages 241-260 in G. A. Polis, M. E. Power, and G. R. Huxel (editors). Food webs at the landscape level. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
  11. RISENG, C. M., M. J. WILEY, AND R. J. STEVENSON. 2004. Hydrologic disturbance and nutrient effects on benthic community structure in midwestern US streams: a covariance structure analysis. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23:309-326.
  12. SILVER, P., C. BROWN MCCALL, AND D. WOOSTER. 2004a. Habitat partitioning by chironomid larvae in arrays of leaf patches in streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23:467-479.
  13. SILVER, P., D. WOOSTER, AND M. A. PALMER. 2004b. Chironomid responses to spatially structured, dynamic, streambed landscapes. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23:69-77.
  14. WINEMILLER, K. O., AND D. B. JEPSEN. 2004. Migratory neotropical fish subsidize food webs of oligotrophic blackwater rivers. Pages 115-132 in G. A. Polis, M. E. Power, and G. R. Huxel (editors). Food webs at the landscape level. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
  15. WINEMILLER, K. O., S. TARIM, D. SHORMANN, AND J. B. COTNER. 2000. Fish assemblage structure in relation to environmental varia- tion among Brazos River oxbow lakes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129:451-468.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Winemiller, K. O., Flecker, A. S., & Hoeinghaus, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of North Texas (US)
Corresponding author
  • Winemiller, Kirk O.
  • Flecker, Alexander S.
  • Hoeinghaus, David J.
Venue
Journal of the North American Benthological Society
Published
2010-03
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
84-99
ISSN
  • 0887-3593 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-237X
OpenAlex
W2169781914
Cited by
266
References
185
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 14
FWCI
15.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the North American Benthological Society (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0321471, 0516831)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Keywords
patch dynamics, environmental heterogeneity, river ecosystems, metacommunity theory, landscape ecology, periodic disturbances, refugia, dispersal, longitudinal gradient, temporal variation, life-history traits, food webs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review