Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 302

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Factors affecting ammonium uptake in streams – an inter‐biome perspective

Webster, Jackson R., Mulholland, Patrick J., Tank, Jennifer L., Valett, H. Maurice, Dodds, Walter K., Peterson, Bruce J., Bowden, William B., Dahm, Clifford N., Findlay, Stuart, Gregory, Stanley V., Grimm, Nancy B., Hamilton, Stephen K., Johnson, Sherri L., Martí, Eugènia, Mcdowell, William H., Meyer, Judy L., Morrall, Donna D., Thomas, Steven A., Wollheim, Wilfred M.·2003·Freshwater Biology

Abstract

Summary: 1. The Lotic Intersite Nitrogen eXperiment (LINX) was a coordinated study of the relationships between North American biomes and factors governing ammonium uptake in streams. Our objective was to relate inter‐biome variability of ammonium uptake to physical, chemical and biological processes. 2. Data were collected from 11 streams ranging from arctic to tropical and from desert to rainforest. Measurements at each site included physical, hydraulic and chemical characteristics, biological parameters, whole‐stream metabolism and ammonium uptake. Ammonium uptake was measured by injection of 15 N‐ammonium and downstream measurements of 15 N‐ammonium concentration. 3. We found no general, statistically significant relationships that explained the variability in ammonium uptake among sites. However, this approach does not account for the multiple mechanisms of ammonium uptake in streams. When we estimated biological demand for inorganic nitrogen based on our measurements of in‐stream metabolism, we found good correspondence between calculated nitrogen demand and measured assimilative nitrogen uptake. 4. Nitrogen uptake varied little among sites, reflecting metabolic compensation in streams in a variety of distinctly different biomes (autotrophic production is high where allochthonous inputs are relatively low and vice versa). 5. Both autotrophic and heterotrophic metabolism require nitrogen and these biotic processes dominate inorganic nitrogen retention in streams. Factors that affect the relative balance of autotrophic and heterotrophic metabolism indirectly control inorganic nitrogen uptake.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01094.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 302

Metadata

Authors
Webster, J. R., Mulholland, P. J., Tank, J. L., Valett, H. M., Dodds, W. K., Peterson, B. J., Bowden, W. B., Dahm, C. N., Findlay, S., Gregory, S. V., Grimm, N. B., Hamilton, S. K., Johnson, S. L., Martí, E., Mcdowell, W. H., Meyer, J. L., Morrall, D. D., Thomas, S. A., & Wollheim, W. M.
Venue
Freshwater Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-07-15
Volume
48
Issue
8
Pages
1329-1352
ISSN
  • 0046-5070 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2427
OpenAlex
W2033182266
Cited by
302
References
2
FWCI
12.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors affecting ammonium uptake in streams – an inter‐biome perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01094.x
The paper
Webster, J. R., Mulholland, P. J., Tank, J. L., Valett, H. M., Dodds, W. K., Peterson, B. J., Bowden, W. B., Dahm, C. N., Findlay, S., Gregory, S. V., Grimm, N. B., Hamilton, S. K., Johnson, S. L., Martí, E., Mcdowell, W. H., Meyer, J. L., Morrall, D. D., Thomas, S. A., & Wollheim, W. M. (2003). Factors affecting ammonium uptake in streams – an inter‐biome perspective. Freshwater Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01094.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.