Nutrient uptake in streams draining agricultural catchments of the midwestern United States
Abstract
Summary: 1. Agriculture is a major contributor of non‐point source pollution to surface waters in the midwestern United States, resulting in eutrophication of freshwater aquatic ecosystems and development of hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. Agriculturally influenced streams are diverse in morphology and have variable nutrient concentrations. Understanding how nutrients are transformed and retained within agricultural streams may aid in mitigating increased nutrient export to downstream ecosystems. 2. We studied six agriculturally influenced streams in Indiana and Michigan to develop a more comprehensive understanding of the factors controlling nutrient retention and export in agricultural streams using nutrient addition and isotopic tracer studies. 3. Metrics of nutrient uptake indicated that nitrate uptake was saturated in these streams whereas ammonium and phosphorus uptake increased with higher concentrations. Phosphorus uptake was likely approaching saturation as evidenced by decreasing uptake velocities with concentration; ammonium uptake velocity also declined with concentration, though not significantly. 4. Higher whole‐stream uptake rates of phosphorus and ammonium were associated with the observed presence of stream autotrophs (e.g. algae and macrophytes). However, there was no significant relationship between measures of nutrient uptake and stream metabolism. Water‐column nutrient concentrations were positively correlated with gross primary production but not community respiration. 5. Overall, nutrient uptake and metabolism were affected by nutrient concentrations in these agriculturally influenced streams. Biological uptake of ammonium and phosphorus was not saturated, although nitrate uptake did appear to be saturated in these ecosystems. Biological activity in agriculturally influenced streams is higher relative to more pristine streams and this increased biological activity likely influences nutrient retention and transport to downstream ecosystems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Agriculture is a large contributor of nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment pollution.
“Agriculture is a large contributor of nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment pollution (Carpenter et al. 1998;Bernot et al. 2006).”
From Phase II MS4 challenges: moving toward effective stormwater management for small municipalities (2022) · cites this paper as Bernot et al. 2006
Agriculture can degrade water quality.
“Agriculture can degrade water quality (Willis and McDowell 1982;Bernot et al. 2006;Schroer 2020)”
From Phase II MS4 challenges: moving toward effective stormwater management for small municipalities (2022) · cites this paper as Bernot et al. 2006
Cites
Quantification of the nitrogen cycle in a prairie stream.
Dodds, W. K., Evans-White, M. A., Gerlanc, N. M., Gray, L., Gudder, D. A., Kemp, M. J., López, A. L., Stagliano, D., Strauss, E. A., Tank, J. L., et al. (2000) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s100210000050 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ARE RIVERS JUST BIG STREAMS? A PULSE METHOD TO QUANTIFY NITROGEN DEMAND IN A LARGE RIVER
Tank, J. L., Rosi-Marshall, E. J., Baker, M. A., & Hall, R. O. (2008) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-1315.1 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Case for Studying Highly Modified Agricultural Streams: Farming for Biogeochemical Insights
Tank, J. L., Speir, S. L., Sethna, L. R., & Royer, T. V. (2021) · Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin · doi:10.1002/lob.10436 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationPhase II MS4 challenges: moving toward effective stormwater management for small municipalities
Rieck, L., Carson, C., Hawley, R. J., Heller, M., Paul, M., Scoggins, M., Zimmerman, M., & Smith, R. F. (2022) · Urban Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s11252-021-01179-3 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- BERNOT, M. J., TANK, J. L., ROYER, T. V., & DAVID, M. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- Kent State University (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- BERNOT, MELODY J.
- Venue
- Freshwater Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-02-10
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 499-509
- ISSN
- 0046-5070 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2427
- OpenAlex
- W2169981617
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 8.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Freshwater Biology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Isotope Analysis in Ecology
- Keywords
- nutrient uptake, agricultural streams, non-point source pollution, eutrophication, nitrate uptake, ammonium uptake, phosphorus uptake, nutrient retention, stream metabolism, gross primary productivity, community respiration, nutrient addition, isotope tracers, nutrient export, Gulf of Mexico hypoxia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review