Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 517

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Photosynthesis and respiration rates depend on leaf and root morphology and nitrogen concentration in nine boreal tree species differing in relative growth rate

Open access
Reich, P. B., Walters, M. B., Tjoelker, M. G., Vanderklein, D., Buschena, C.·1998·Functional Ecology

Abstract

1. To test several hypotheses about acclimation and adaptation of photosynthesis and respiration to differing light conditions, we investigated the interspecific relationships between leaf and root metabolism, chemistry and morphology in high and low light conditions for young seedlings of nine boreal tree species that differ in relative growth rate (RGR). 2. Light‐saturated net photosynthesis (Asat), whole‐plant nitrogen (N) uptake rates, leaf and root respiration and morphology, and RGR all varied in parallel among the nine species when grown in both 5% and 25% of full sunlight. RGR, Asat, leaf and root respiration (Rd), and N uptake rate per unit root mass or length differed significantly among species, ranking (from high to low): Populus, Betula and Larix spp. (all deciduous) and then to five evergreen conifers (Pinus, Picea and Thuja spp.), which were generally comparable in these measures. 3. A sat, leaf and root Rd and N uptake rates were all correlated (r≈ 0·8 to 0·9) with species traits, such as seed mass, leaf life span and shade‐tolerance rankings. Mass‐based Asat was greater in conifer seedlings raised in low than high light. In contrast, area‐based Asat was higher for plants grown in high than low light, especially in the deciduous species. Once adjusted for differences in plant mass, leaf or root respiration rates did not differ for plants grown in low vs high light. 4. Interspecific variation in RGR was positively correlated (r≈ 0·9) with rates of photosynthesis, respiration and N uptake. Leaf photosynthesis and respiration rates were correlated to specific leaf area and leaf N concentrations (r≈ 0·9). Root respiration rates, N uptake rates, specific root length (root length per root dry mass) and root N concentrations were all highly correlated with each other (r≈ 0·8 to 0·9). These data suggest a close coupling of tissue‐level metabolism, chemistry and structure with whole‐plant performance and species ecophysiological and life‐history traits.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00209.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 517

Metadata

Authors
Reich, P. B., Walters, M. B., Tjoelker, M. G., Vanderklein, D., & Buschena, C.
Venue
Functional Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-06
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
395-405
ISSN
  • 0269-8463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2435
OpenAlex
W2110082851
Cited by
517
References
27
FWCI
17.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Photosynthesis and respiration rates depend on leaf and root morphology and nitrogen concentration in nine boreal tree species differing in relative growth rate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00209.x
The paper
Reich, P. B., Walters, M. B., Tjoelker, M. G., Vanderklein, D., & Buschena, C. (1998). Photosynthesis and respiration rates depend on leaf and root morphology and nitrogen concentration in nine boreal tree species differing in relative growth rate. Functional Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00209.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.